it evidently should not, according to our views, hes- the British nation, and that he itate about the determination to be taken.

"Lord Lyons is already instructed to present the demand for satisfaction, which the English Cabinet is under the necessity of reducing to form, and which consists in the immediate release of the persons taken from on board the Trent, and in sending explanations which may take from this act its offensive character toward the British flag. The Federal Government will be inspired by a just and exalted feeling in deferring to these requests. One would search in vain to what end, for what interest, it would hazard to provoke by a different attitude a rupture with Great Britain.

The French view.

Seward's Answer.

is equally just in assuming that
the United States would consistently vindicate, by
their practice on this occasion, the character they
have so long maintained as an advocate of the most
liberal principles concerning the rights of neutral
States in maritime war.

"When the French Government shall come to see at large the views of this Government and those of the Government of Great Britain on the subject now in question, and to compare them with the views expressed by M. Thouvenel on the part of France, it will probably perceive that, while it must be admitted that those three powers are equally impressed with the same desire for the establishment of principles favorable to neutral rights, there is, at the same time, not such an entire agreement concerning the application of those principles as is desirable to secure that important object.

"

"For ourselves, we should see in that fact a deplorable complication, in every respect, of the difficulties with which the Cabinet at Washington has already to struggle, and a precedeut of a nature seriously to disquiet all the powers which continue outside of The Government of the United States will be the existing contest. We believe that we give evi-happy if the occasion which has elicited this corredence of loyal friendship for the Cabinet of Wash- spondence can be improved so as to secure a more ington by not permitting it to remain in ignorance, definite agreement upon the whole subject all by in this condition of things, of our manner of regard- maritime powers. ing it. I request you, therefore, sir, to seize the first occasion of opening yourself frankly to Mr. Seward, and, if he asks it, send him a copy of this dispatch.

You will assure M. Thouvenel that this Government appreciates as well the frankness of his explanations as the spirit of friendship and good will towards the United States, in which they are

"Receive sir, the assurances of my high consider-expressed. THOUVENEL.

ation.

"It is a sincere pleasure for the United States to

Monsieur HENRI MERCIER, Minister of the Empe- exchange assurances of a friendship which had its ror at Washington."

Mr. Seward's reply was in excellent tone, seizing that opportunity as the good occasion whereby to make a forcible and pertinent request:

"DEPARTMENT OF STATE, "WASHINGTON, Dec. 27th, 1861. "M. HENRI MERCIER, &C., &c. :

"Sir: I have submitted to

Seward's Answer. the President the copy you

were so good as to give me of the dispatch addressed to you on the 3d of December instant, concerning the recent proceedings of Captain Wilkes in arresting certain persons on board of the British contract mail steamer Trent.

"Before receiving the paper, however, the President had decided upon the disposition to be made of the subject, which has caused so much anxiety

in Europe. That disposition of the subject, as I think, renders unnecessary any discussion of it in reply to the comments of M. Thouvenel. I am permitted, however, to say that M. Thouvenel has not been in error in supposing-first, that the Government of the United States has not acted in any spirit of disregard of the rights or of the sensibilities of

origin in associations the most sacred in the history of both countries.

I avail myself of this opportunity to renew to you, sir, the assurance of my high consideration. "WILLIAM H. SEWARD."

Lord Lyons did not await the remission to his Government of Mr. Seward's reply in or der to accept the terms conceded. The Confederate ambassadors were released Jan. 1st, passing out of the fort in a quiet manner to a tugboat in waiting. The tug conveyed them to Provincetown, where they were transferred to the British war steamer Rinaldo, which sailed, the same evening, for England. Thus ended an affair that gave promise of one of the most serious wars of modern times. That this country came out of the difficulty with honor, even its enemies confessed. The settlement was a staggering blow to those friends of the Southern Confederacy abroad who saw, in the impending collision, the surest way to Southern independence. It signally defeated the combinations and ma

The Good Result.

BATTLE OF BELMONT.

chinations of the secessionists abroad whose | rebuke which must have been humiliating, sharpest weapons were falsehoods and misrepresentations. It materially qualified the effect of Jefferson Davis' message of November 18th, [see pages -] especially directed to the end of obtaining foreign sympathy. To the great majority of English journals which had fairly reeked with invective and defamation toward the United States Government, as a people and a power, it was a

SPRINGFIELD. THE MISSOURI SERVICE. NEW MILITARY DEPARTMENTS. CON

OF FEDERAL FORCES. HUNTER'S REPUDIATION THE FREMONT PRICE "TREATY." THE "TREATY" AND HUNTER'S REASONS FOR REPUDIATING IT. FREMONT'S ERRORS.

Battle of Belmont.

Battle of Belmont.

gunboats proceeded down | infantry and artillery, and the river to engage the after a desperate resistance batteries above Columbus. Grant in his re- drove the enemy back the third time, forcing port said of his disposition of forces: "Know- them to seek cover among thick woods and ing that Columbus was strongly garrisoned, brush, protected by the heavy guns at CoI asked General Smith, commanding at Pa- lumbus. While this struggle was going on ducah, Ky., to make demonstrations in the a tremendous fire from the Twenty-seventh, same directions. He did so, by ordering a which had approached the abattis on the small force to Mayfield, and another in the right and rear of the tents, was heard. About direction of Columbus, not to approach near- the same time the Seventh and Twenty-secer, however, than twelve or fifteen miles. I ond, which had passed the rear of the Thirtieth also sent a small force on the Kentucky side, and Thirty-first, hastened up, and, closing some twelve miles from Columbus. All this the space between them and the Twenty-sevserved to distract the enemy, and lead him enth, poured a deadly fire upon the enemy. to think he was to be attacked in his strong- A combined movement was now made upon ly fortified position." three sides of the enemy's works, and, driving him across the abattis, we followed close. upon his heels into the clear space around his camp."

The enemy was on the alert. The Federals moved forward to find their antagonists drawn up in a good position, nearly two miles in advance of their entrenched camp on the river, immediately opposite and protected by the Columbus batteries. Grant said: "At daylight we proceeded down the river to a point just out of range of the rebel guns, and debarked on the Missouri shore. From here the troops were marched by a flank for about one mile towards Belmont, and then drawn up in line, one battalion having been left as a reserve near the transports. Two companies from each regiment, five skeletons in number, were thrown out as skirmishers to ascertain the position of the enemy.

"It was but a few moments before they met him, and a general engagement ensued. The balance of my force, with the exception of the reserve, was then thrown forward, all as skirmishers, and the enemy driven, foot by foot, and from tree to tree back to their encampment on the river's bank, a distance of over two miles. Here they had strengthened their position by felling the timber for several hundred yards around their camp, and making a sort of abattis.

"Our men charged through this, driving the enemy over the river banks and into their transports in quick time, leaving us in possession of everything not exceedingly portable."

This brief mention covers much gallant action. The fight was one of great obstinacy and was only won by the unflinching nerve of the assailants. McClernand, after adverting to the enemy's attempt to cut his line and his disposition to avert their design, thus characterised the struggle which followed: "We again opened a deadly fire from both

slain.

In this fierce contest many brave men were Grant's horse was there killed under him. McClernand's horse was struck several times. Colonel Lanmann fell. Yet, considering the exposure and daring of officers and men, the loss was comparatively small.

But, the victory, though won, was not secure. Bishop Polk, in his special dispatch to Jefferson Davis, said:

"The enemy came down on the opposite side of the river Belmont to-day, about seven thousand five hundred strong, landed under cover of gunboats, and attacked Colonel Tappan's camp. I sent over three regiments, under General Pillow, to his relief, then at intervals three others, then General Cheat ham. I then took over two others in person, to support a flank movement which I had directed. It was a hard fought battle, lasting from half-past ten A. M. to five P. M. They took Beltzhoover's battery, four pieces of which we recaptured. The enemy were thoroughly routed. We purrued them to their boats, seven miles, then drove their boats before The road was strewn with their dead and wounded, guns, ammunition and equipments. Our loss is considerable-theirs heavy."

us.

The first three Confederate regiments under Pillow participated in the early fight, and were driven back into the timber after attempting to cut McClerland's line. The other reenforcements sent over by Polk, under Cheatham and others, joined Pillow's forces above the camp, with the well conceiv ed purpose of cutting off the Federal retreat to the transports, four miles away.

Even

BATTLE OF BELMONT.

413

Battle of Belmont.

Battle of Belmont.

In this ratio

while the Illinois and Iowa | engaged, in killed, wound"boys" were shouting for ed and missing, as three the Union in the captured camp, the enemy hundred and sixty-four. was planting his forces, three to one, in the way of a retreat. Eight full regiments, in addition to such of Tappan's finely armed brigade as could be gathered, were thus thrown into position on the line. Grant was not caught unawares. Almost as soon as the camp was captured he fired its property and sounded the retreat. He said:

their total loss must have reached a number but little short of one thousand.

“Belmont is on low ground, and every foot of it commanded by the guns on the opposite shore, and, of course, could not be held for a single hour after the enemy became aware of the withdrawal of their troops. Having no wagons with me I could not move any of the captured property, consequently gave orders for its destruction. Their tents, blan

As will be inferred from, General Polk's dispatch to Jefferson Davis, the Confederates claimed a great victory. Davis returned his congratulations to General Polk. "Accept," he said, "for yourself and the officers and men under your command, my sincere thanks for the glorious contribution you have just. made to our common cause." And, in his message of November 18th, he referred to the battle of Belmont as one of the "glorious victories" which had blessed the Confederate arms He did not, of course, allude to the guns which Grant had carried away-to the entrenched encampment destroyed-to the true nature of the Federal "advance."

kets, &c., were set on fire, and we retreated, taking their artillery with us, two pieces being drawn by hand, and one by an inefficient team, were spiked and left in the woods, bringing two to this place, The dispatch of Colonel Ogilvie from Cai"Before getting fairly under way, the enemy ro, and the movement of troops from Cape made his appearance again and attempted to surGirardeau and Ironton-all designed to surround us. Our troops were not in the least dis- prise Jefferson Thompson's camp at Bloomcouraged, but charged the enemy and again defeat-field-was only a partial success.

ed him."

McClernand, in his report, detailed with much pride the splendid conduct of his men in the retreat. It was a fight in solid column, the artillery opening the way before them. The enemy, easily broken, fought with great irregularity. A lack of generalship was shown in their manoeuvres. Had they been well ordered the route to the transports must have been thick with Federal dead.

After a

painful march through the Big Mingo swamp, Ogilvie arrived at Bloomfield on the morning of November 7th, to find Thompson and his braves gone: they had incontinently fled to the swamps.

These dashes by Grant served the good purpose of inspiriting the troops if nothing else. Long inactivity in camp rendered them uneasy, while their employment in active service excited that emulation which is the best

The official returns gave the following ta- assurance of success. The retreat of Fre

ble of Federal loss:

Seventh Iowa regiment..

mont's advance upon Springfield, and the Killed. Wou ded. Missing. centralization of his forces at Rolla, St.

26

75

119