a Devil to put the blame on, does not look to the average man like the soul of that universe of which he learns and has experience during the week. When men have to choose between faith and sight, no wonder they incline to choose sight, and religion suffers. But the world needs religion, in some sense, and may need it more. With our superficiality, our restless pursuit of pleasure, our ruthless selfseeking, we may need a revival of the sense of sin, and may even be seeking a source of redemption. What science may tell us of the injury to ourselves and to society wrought by our course of life is not enough; the heedless world will take chances. The world needs the absolute to come down and stiffen it. Yet neither of our modern religions can bring this, neither the narrow old nor the flabby new. Such dilemmas, in which the thinking man constantly finds himself, intellectual history helps us to understand, and one day may help us to solve. When one talks of the past, a certain feeling of chivalry leads one to take up the cudgels in behalf of our now helpless ancestors. They were not all fools, even though they are dead. But more than this, they and the view of history which we get through surveying them may teach us some precious things; things for which in these trying days of world-history we may be grateful. They teach us to stand firm and not to be swept off our feet by new isms and new ideals, which too may pass away; not to give up ourselves to everyone who has just found, or forged, a new key to the kingdom of heaven. They give us renewed confidence in the good sense and good feeling of the bulk of humanity; they show that in the long run the world has always acted rationally, under its circumstances, and that where the world has gone wrong it has been led wrong by ill-proportioned ideals. They make us feel that action and reaction, recurrence and cycle, have been due to intelligent free-agents trying to square themselves and their world with an absolute good beyond them; and that we can do no less, and with their guidance may do it better. MANU AND THE FISH (Translated from the Mahabharata.) ARTHUR W. RYDER There was a gentle, holy sage The woes of life he would not blink; With ragged clothes and frowsy hair He saw a fish who thus began I am a little fish, you see; So dreadful terror weighs me down; So Manu, when he heard his wish, And dropped him in a water-jar And in the jar the little fish Had everything his heart could wish. He grew and thrived on food and fun, At last he grew too big by far To live within the water-jar. He said: "Good Manu, I would thank So Manu took him to a tank Eight miles in breadth from bank to bank, And twice as long. There, free from fears, He lived and grew for many years. And when he grew too big to play And I will never show you spite, Kind Manu, anxious to deliver His friend, went to the Ganges River, He grew in time a little more. And then he said to Manu: "Dear, I can no longer wiggle here. My holy friend, be good to me, So Manu took him tenderly And travelled quickly to the sea. The fish, when he had reached the ocean, You do as much as fathers can. And now 'tis time for me to do A dreadful time is near at hand So build a ship, and build it strong; Embark then with the seven seers, Till then, farewell. Do not delay. Then Manu packed most carefully He longed to see the friendly fish, So Manu, feeling less forlorn, But when the wind began to roar The tossing, shaken ship began To stagger like a drunken man. No land remained to cheer them there, But only water, sky, and air; |