Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB

The uncommon importance of the subject induces us to
give the following document nearly entire; reserv
ing our remarks on it to a future opportunity.
Report from the Committee of the HOUSE OF COM-
MONS, on the State of the Woollen Manufacture of
England, &c.

IN July 1802, considerable riots and outrages
took place in Wiltshire and Somersetshire, in con-
sequence of an attempt of some of the master
clothiers of those counties, to set up a machine
for dressing cloth, called a gig mill.
This ma-

chine was, from various causes, obnoxious to the workmen, and the discontents continuing, and the workmen, learning that there still was to be found in the statute book an ancient law prohibiting under heavy penalties the use of a machine called a gig mill (though doubts existed whether it was the ma hine which now bears that denomination, conceived the project of preventing its further establishment, by calling the above statute into operation.

But it farther appeared, that various other penal Jaws, concerning the woollen manufacture, still remained unrepealed, consequently that they were still in force, though for a very long course of years they had been so little adverted to, as almost to have become obsolete. This produced petitions and counter-petitions; so that the House of Commons in consequence, appointed a Committee to consider the petitions of the masters and workmen in the woollen manufacture. The case was fully investigated, and the evidence, which had been taken at great length, was reported to the house.

The expedient was adopted of suspending all the penal laws, above alluded to, for a year, with an intention of resuming the consideration of the subject in the ensuing session.

Under these circumstances, the committee carefully examined the various acts of parliament, (in all 70) which are still in force; considering how far, in the present day, and in the existing state of the commerce and manufactures of this country, it might be advisable, either to suffer them to continue in operation, or on the other hand, to explain, alter, or repeal them.

The Laws relative to the wool'en manufacture may be conveniently arranged under the following classes.

CLASS I.-On the laws comprised within the first class, intituled, "Acts for regulating the conduct of masters and workmen in the woollen manufacture, and for preventing frauds and embezzlements by journeymen and others," your committee need only remark, that they are in general wise and salutary. This character appears to belong in a special degree to one very ancient statute, which has been amended and enforced by several subsequent acts, particularly by 29th Geo. II. c. 33 for preventing the payment of workmen in goods instead of money. Your committee

therefore recommend that the laws contained in this class should remain in force.

CLASS II.-Your committee extend the same recommendation to the laws comprised within the second class, intituled, "Acts to prevent the exportation of certain materials and implements made use of in the woollen manufacture, &c." These statutes indeed have all been passed in the

reign of his present Majesty. They appear to your committee to be founded in sound policy, and to be peculiarly applicable to the present circumstances of this country.

CLASS III.-The 3d class of Acts, which "controul the manufacturers in the making and selling of woollen cloths," is by far the most numerous. Many of them are of a very early date; and their con ents are such as might be expected from the nature of the commercial principles which prevailed at the periods when they were severally passed. Their general object is, to provide against the use of articles, or processes, and to prevent the commission of frauds, which it was conceived would be injurious to the quality of the cloth, and (to say nothing of the home consumer) would, by impairing the credit of our staple manufacture, obstruct its sale in foreign parts. Again, there are others of this class of laws which bear some traces of a jealousy of the manufacturing in favour of the landed interest of the country.

Many of the above statutes have been from time to time amended, and in part repealed, often at short periods after their enactment; others of them have not been enforced for many years; and nearly the whole had sunk into oblivion, when attempts were made to recal some of them into action in the manner which has been already specified.

Considering the different principles of commerce which are now recognised, it cannot be necessary for your committee to enter into a minute detail of the reasons on which they recommend to the House the repeal of the general mass of the above laws, as being at this day not only unne cessary, But, if enforced, utterly inexpedient, or rather extremely injurious. Least of all can such regulations be deemed requisite at the present period, when our manufactures of wool en goods are in the highest credit both at home and abroad, and when the demand for them, great as it already is, appears to be still increasing.

But on some of the statutes which belong to this class, great differences of opinion have prevailed, and it will therefore be necessary for the committee to enter more in detail into the consideration of them. One of these is the 5th and 6th of Edward VI. for putting down gig mills. Various witnesses were called to prove that the machine now used under the denomination of the gig mill, for the purpose, after the cloth comes from the fulling mill, of raising the nap or wool, (being the very machine, it is contended, against which the ancient statute was directed) is highly injurious to the texture and quality of the cloth; that therefore the law of Edward for promoting its use, ought, if necessary, to be explained and enforced, it being one of those statutes which, to use the words of the petitioners, though they have been violated by the master clothiers, under the. pretence of their being obsolete, are calculated to promote the preservation and prosperity of the woollen manufacture, and the protection of the persons employed therein. Evidence of a similar nature and tendency was given respecting the injurious effects of another machine, as yet not much in use, called the shearing frame, the purpose of which is to cut off the nap or wool after it has been raised; an operation which has been hitherto performed by hand by a particular class

of men, called, from their occupation, croppers, shearmen, or clothworkers. The introduction of this machine appears to be opposed with the greater earnestness, because the general establishment of it would be likely to throw a very considerable class of men out of their present employment. With regard to the actual effects on the cloth, of the gig mill, and shearing frame, your committee feel it their duty to declare, that decisive evidence has been adduced before them, by merchants and manufacturers of the highest credit and of the greatest experience, to prove that the above machines, especially the gig mill, the use of which has been longer and more generall v established, when properly regu ated and carefully employed, finish the cloth in the most perfect manner. It has already been stated, that manufacturers residing in parts of the country where, from whatever causes, the gig mill was not used, have often sent their cloths to a distance to be dressed by it; and your committee have learned from the information of one of their own members, that, by an express stipulation, the use of it has been required by the consumers of our cloths in a particular foreign market, where it has enhanced their credit and improved their sale. It has been given in evidence before your committee, and even acknowledged by some of the petitioners themselves, that alarms similar in nature to those which are now conceived of the gig mill and shearing frame, attended the first introduction of several of the machines which are now generally used with acknowledged advantage in different processes, formerly performed by band, of the woollen manufacture. Hitherto these alarms have after a time subsided, and the use of the machines has been gradually established, without, as it appears, impairing the comforts, or lessening the numbers of the workmen and prejudices, however powerful at first, have worn away as time and experience have enabled the opponents of such improvements more justly to appreciate their merit, and anticipate their success.

:

Moreover, it is highly satisfactory to remark, that, in many instances in which it was apprehended that the introduction of particular machines would throw such numbers of people out of employment, as to occasion great distress, the result has been very different, for, to say nothing of the new occupations for which the attendance on such machines has given occasion, a fresh demand for labour to an immense extent has arisen out of the increased sale of the article, consequent on the greater cheapness and superior quality of the manufacture.

Neither is it to be forgotten, that the system of patents, a system by which the inventor of any new machine commonly secures to himself for a time the exclusive benefits of his discovery, while at the end of the term they are thrown open to the public at large, provides in most cases against its too sudden and general establishment, by which a great multitude of workmen might be all at once thrown out of employment.

But your committee would be wanting to the important subject entrusted to their consideration, If they were to forbear remarking, that, if the principles on which the use of these particular machines is objected to were once admitted, it would be impossible to draw the line, or to fore

see the fatal extent of their application. No on will deny, that, if parliament had acted on such principles so years ago, the woollen manufacture would never have attained to half its present size. The rapid and prodigious increase of late years in the manufactures and commerce of this country is universally known, as well as the effects of that increase on our revenue and national strength; and in considering the immediate causes of that augmentation, it will appear that, under the favour of providence, it is principally to be ascribed to the general spirit of enterprise and industry among a free and enlightened people, left to the unrestrained exercise of their talents in the employment of a vast capital; pushing to the utmost the principle of the division of labour; calling in all the resources of scientific research and mechanical ingenuity; and finally, availing themselves of all the benefits to be derived from visiting foreign countries, not only for forming new, and confirming old commercial connections, but for obtaining a personal knowledge of the wants, the taste, the habits, the discoveries and improvements, the productions and fabrics of other civilized nations, and, by thus bringing home facts and suggestions, perfecting our existing manufactures, and adding new ones to our domestic stock; opening at the same time new markets for the product of our manufacturing and commercial industry, and qualifying ourselves for supplying them.

It is by these means alone, and, above all, your committee must repeat it, by the effect of machinery in improving the quality and cheapening the fabrication of our various articles of export, that, with a continually accumulating weight of taxes, and with all the necessaries and comforts of life gradually increasing in price, the effects of which on the wages of labour could not but be very considerable, our commerce and manufactures have been also increasing in such a degree as to surpass the most sanguine calculations of the ablest political writers who had speculated on the improvements of a future age.

It is likewise an important consideration, of which we never should lose sight, that we are at this day surrounded by powerful and civilized nations, who are intent on cultivating their manufactures and pushing their commerce; and who are the more eager to become our competitors in trade, from having witnessed the astonishing effects of our commercial prosperity.

Your committee were therefore not surprized to hear that attempts have been made to carry over to foreign countries our machines and implements, and to tempt our artizans to settle in them; at tempts, of the probability of which the legislature has appeared fully sensible, by passing laws from time to time for preventing their success. Your committee has even received specific evidence of an establishment having been made in Paris for carrying on the wool en manufacture on the most improved plan, with all our machinery (among the rest those very machines, the gig mill and shearing frame) under the direction of a man of approved skill both in constructing and using them. Your committee need not remark how much these attempts would be favoured by, our throwing any obstructions in the way of enterprize and ingenuity, and the free application of capital

in this country; or that any machines, the use of which should be prohibited here, would infallibly find their way into foreign nations.

Your committee therefore cannot but include among the laws of which they recommend the repeal, the 5th and 6th of Edw. VI. for putting down gig milis; and also all the other statutes recited in the Appendix, which, as some of the petitioners conceive, prohibit, though less directly the use of particular articles of macninery.

The committee also recommend the repeal of all the acts comprised in the third class, controlling the making and selling of cloth, excepting only those which prohibit its exportation in an unwrought state.

The 2nd and 3rd of Ph. and Mary is another of the acts comprised within the 3rd class: This statute commonly called the Weavers' Act, among other regulations limits the number of looms which persons residing in villages may keep in one house. It is highly valued, and its repeal strongly opposed, by another very respectable class of petitioners. But in order that the House may enter more distinctly into the principles and reasonings which belong to this part of the subjcct, it may be expedient for your committee to state that there are three different m des of carrying on the woollen manufacture; that of the master clothier of the West of England, the Factory, and, the domestic system.

In all the western counties as well as the north, there are factories, but the master clothier of the west of England, buys his wool from the importer, if it be foreign, or in the fleece, or of the wool stapler, if it be of domestic growth; atter which, in all the different processes through which it passes, he is under the necessity of employing as many distinct classes of persons; sometimes working in their own houses, sometimes in those of the master clothier, but none of them going out of their proper line. Each class of workmen, however, acquires great skill in performing its particular operation, and hence may have arisen the acknowledged excellence, and, till of late, superiority, of the cloths of the West of England. It is however a remarkable fact, of which your committe has been assured by one of its own member, that previously to the introduction of machinery, it was very common, and it is said sometimes to happen at this day, for the north countryman to come into the West of England, and, in the clothing districts of that part of the kingdom, to purchase his wool; which he carries home; where, having worked it up into cloth, he brings it back again, and sells it in its native district. This is supposed to arise from the northern clothier being at liberty to work himself and employ his own family and others, in any way which i.is interest or convenience may suggest.

In the factory system the master manuf crurers who sometimes possess a very great capital, employ in one or more buildings or factories, under their own or their superintendant's inspection, a number of workmen, more or fewer according to the extent of their trade. This system, it is obvious, admits in practice of local variations. But both in the system of the West of England clothier, and in the factory system, the work, generally speaking is done by persons who have no property in the goods they manufacture, for in

th's consists th essential distinction between the two former systems, and the domestic.

In the last mentioned, or domestic system, which is that of Yorkshire, the manufacture is conducted by a multitude of master manufacturers, generally possessing a very small, and scarcely ever any great extent of capital. They buy the wool of the dealer; and, in their own houses, assisted by their wives and children, and from two or three to six or seven journeymen, they dye it (when dyeing is necessary) and through all the different stages work it into undressed cloth.

Various processcs, however, the chief of which were formerly done by hand, under the manufvcturer's own roof, are now performed by machinery, in public mills, as they are called, which work for hire. There are several such mills near every manufacturing village, so that the manufacturer, with little inconvenience or loss of time, carries thither his goods, and fetches them back again when the process is completed. When it has attained to the state of undressed cloth; he carries it on the market day to a public hall or market, where the merchants repair to purchase.

Several thousands of these small master manufacturers attend the market of Leeds, where there are three halls for the exposure and sale of their cloths and there are other similar halls, where the same system of selling in public market prevails, at Bradford, Halifax, and Huddersfield. The halls consist of long walks or galleries, throughout the whole length of which the master manufacturers stand in a double row, each behind his own little division or stand, as it is termed, on which his goods are exposed to sale. In the interval between these rows the merchants pass along, and make their purchases. At the end of an hour. on the ringing of a bell, the market closes, and such cloths as have been purchased are carried home to the merchants' houses; such goods as remain unsold continuing in the halls till they find a purchaser at some ensuing market, It should however be remarked, that a practice has also obtained of late years, of merchants giv ing out samples to some manufacturer whom they approve, which goods are brought to the merchant directly, without ever coming into the hails. These however, no less than the others, are manufactured by him in his own family. The greater merchants have their working room, or, as it is termed, their shop, in which their workmen, or, as they are termed, croppers, all work together. The goods which, as it has been already stated, are bought in the undressed state, here undergo various processes, till, being completely finished, they are sent away for the use of the consumer, either in the home or the foreign market; the merchants sending them abroad directly without the intervention of any other factor. Sometimes again the goods are dressed at a stated rate by dressers, who take them in for that purpose. The greater part of the domestic clothiers livein villages and detached houses, covering the whole face of a district of from 20 to 30 miles in length, and from 12 to 15 in breadth. Coal abounds throughout the whole of it; and a great proportion of the manufacturers occupy a little land, from 3 to 12 or 15 acres each. They often likewise keep a horse, to carry their cloth to the fulling mill and the market.

Though the system which has been just described be that which has been generally established in the West Riding of Yorkshire, yet there have long been a few factories in the neighbourhood of Halifax and Huddersfield; and four or five more, one however of which has been since discontinued, have been set on foot not many years ago in the neighbourhood of Leeds. These have for some time been objects of great jealousy to the domestic clothiers The most serious apprehensions have been stated, by witnesses who bave given their evidence before your committee in behalf of the domestic manufacturers, lest the factory system should gradually root out the domestic; and lest the independent little master manufacturer, who works on his own account, should sink into a journeyman working for hire. It is for the purpose of counteracting this supposed tendency of the factory system to increase, that a camerous class of petition: rs wish, instead of repealing, to amend and enforce the act of Philip and Mary, for restricting the number of looms to be worked in any one tenement; and with a similar view they wish to retain in force the 5th of Elizabeth, which enacts the system of apprenticeship. On this latter head your committee will have occasion to say more hereafter; but it seemed right just to notice the circumstance in this place.

Your committee cannot wonder that the domestic clothiers of Yorkshire are warmly attached to their accustomed mode of carrying on the manufacture: It is not merely that they are accustened to it-it obviously possesses many eminent advantages seldom found in a great manufac

[ocr errors]

It is one peculiar recommendation of the domestic system of manufacture, that, as it has been expressly stated to your committee, a young man of good character can always obtain credit for as much wool as will enable him to set up as a little master manufacturer, and the public mills, which are now established in all parts of the clothing district, and which work for hire at an easy rate, enable him to command the use of very expensive and complicated machines, the construction and necessary repairs of which would require a considerable capital. Thus, in tances not unfrequently occur, wherein men rise from low beginnings, if not to excessive wealth, yet to a situation of comfort and independence.

It is another advantage of the domestic system of manufacture, and an advantage which is obviously not confined to the individuals who are engaged in it, but which, as well as other parts of this system, extends its benefits to the landholder, that any sudden stoppage of a foreign market, any failure of a great house, or any other of those adverse shocks to which our foreign trade especially is liable, in its present extended state, has not the effect of throwing a great number of workmen out of employ, as it often does, when the stroke falls on the capital of a single individual. In the domestic system, the loss is spread over a large superficies; it affects the whole body of the manufacturers; and, though each little master be a sufferer, yet few if any feel the blow so severely as to be altogether ruined. Moreover, it appears in evidence, that, in such cases as these, they seldoma turn off any of their standing set of journey

men, but keep them at work in hopes of better

times.

On the whole, your committee feel no little sa tisfaction in bearing their testimony to the merits of the domestic system of manufacture; to the facilities it affords to men of steadiness and industry to establish themselves as little master manufacturers, and maintain their families in comfort by their own industry and frugality; and to the encouragement which it thus holds out to demestic habits and virtues. Neither can they omit to notice its favourable tendencies on the health and morals of a large and important class of the community.

But while your committee thus freely recognize the merits and value of the domestic system, they at the same time feel it their duty to declare it as their decided opinion, that the apprehensions entertained of its being rooted out by the factory system, are, at present at least, wholly without

foundation.

For, happily, the merchant no less than the domestic manufacturer finds his interest and convenience promoted by the domestic system-while it continues, he is able to carry on his trade with far less capital than if he were to be the manufacturer of his own cloth. Large sums must then be irrecoverably invested in extensive buildings and costly machinery; and, which perhaps is a consideration of even still more force, he must submit to the constant trouble and solicitude of watching over a numerous body of workmen. He might then often incur the expence of manufacturing articles, which, from some disappointment in the market, must either be kept on hand, or be sold to a loss. As it is, he can agree with his customer, at home or abroad, for any quantity of goods; and whether on a long expected or a sudden demand, he can repair at once to the market, and most probably purchase to the precise extent of his known wants; or, if the market happen not to furnish what he wishes to purchase, he can give out his sample, and have his order executed immediately.

While these and various other considerations, which might be stated, interest the merchant, as well as the manufacturer, in the continuance of the domestic system; and when it is remembered that this mode of conducting the trade greatly multiplies the merchants, by enabling men to carry on business with a comparatively small capital, your committee cannot participate in the apprehensions which are entertained by the domestic clothiers. In fact, there are many merchants, of very large capitals and of the highest credit, who for several generations have gone on purchasing in the halls, and some of this very description of persons state to your committee that they not only had no thoughts of setting up factories themselves, but that they believed many of those who had established them, were not greatly atta hed to that system, but only persisted in it because their buildings and machinery must otherwise lie a dead weight upon their hands. Under these circumstances, the lively fears, of the decline of the domestic, and the general estab ishment of the factory system, may reasonably excite surprize It may have been in part occasioned by the decrease of the master manufacturers in the

immediate neighbourhood of the large towns, es

pecially in two or three populous hamlets adjoining to Leeds, whence they have migrated to a greater distance in the country, where they might enjoy a little land, and other conveniencies and comforts. It may have strengthened the impression, that, as your committee have already stated, three or four factories have, within no very long period of time, been established in Leeds, or its vicinity.

But your committee are happy in being able to adduce one irrefragable fact, in corroboration of the sentiments they have already expressed on this question: This is, that the quantity of cloth manufactured by the domestic system has increased mmensely of late years. not only in itself, but as compared with the quantity made in factories.

Several factories, it has been observed, had long been established near Halifax and Huddersfield, but the principal progress of the factory system, and that which chiefly created the alarm, is stated to have been, within about the last fourteen years, in the town and neighbourhood of Leeds.-Your committee succeeded in their endeavours to discover the quantity of cloth annually manufactured in all these factories, and it was found not to exceed 8,000 pieces. According to the provisions of the acts commonly called the Stamping Acts, 11 Geo. II. and 5 and 6 G. o. III. Returns are made every Easter to the justices at Pontefract sessions, of the quantity of cloth which has been made in the preceding year; the account being kept at the fulling mills by officers appointed for that purpose. These returns your committee carefully examined for the last 14 years, and find that in the year 1792, being by far the greatest year of export then known, there were manufactured 190,332 pieces of broad, and 150,666 pieces of narrow cloth: Yet the quantity of cloth manufactured in 1805 was 300,237 pieces broad, and 165,847 pieces of narrow cloth, giving an increase, in favour of 1805, of 109,905 pieces broad, and 15,181 pieces narrow; from which increase deducting the cloth manufactured in factories, there remains an increase of about 100,000 broad, and 15,181 narrow pieces, to be placed to the account of the domestic system. The comparatively small quantity of cloth manufactured by the factories will excite less surprise, when it is considered that they are better adapted to the manufacturing of fancy goods, of which immense quantities and great varieties have been invented aud sold, chiefly for a foreign market, of late years.

Your committee have the satisfaction of seeing, that the apprehensions entertained of factories are not only vicious in principle, but that they are practically erroneous; to such a degree, that even the very opposite dispositions might be reasonably entertained; nor would it be difficult to prove, that the factories, to a certain extent at least, and in the present day, seem absolutely necessary to the well-being of the domestic system; supplying those very particulars wherein the domestic system must be acknowledged to be inherently de. fective: for, it is obvious, that the little master manufacturers cannot afford, like the man who possesses considerable capital, to try the experiments which are requisite, and incur the risks, and even losses, which almost always occur, in inventing and perfecting new articles of manufac

ture, or in carrying to a state of greater perfection articles already established. He cannot learn, by personal inspection, the wants and habits, the arts, manufactures, and improvements of foreign countries; diligence, economy, and prudence are the requisites of his character, not invention, taste, and enterprize; nor would he be warranted in hazarding the loss of any part of his small capital. He walks in a sure road as long as he treads in the beaten track; but he must not deviate into the paths of speculation. The owner of a factory, on the contrary, being common y possessed of a large capital and having all his workmen employed under his own immediate superintendance, may make experiments, hazard speculations, invent shorter or better modes of performing old processes, may introduce new articles, and improve and perfect old ones, thus giving the range to his taste and fancy, and, thereby alone, enabling our manufacturers to stand the competition with their commercial rivals in other countries Meanwhile as is well worthy of remark and experience abundantly warrants the assertion), many of these new fabrics and inventions, when their success is once established, become general among the whole body of manufacturers: the domestic manufacturers themselves thus benefiting, in the end, from those very factories which had been at first the objects of their jealousy. The history of almost all our other manufactures, in which great improvements have been made of late years, in some cases at an immense expence, and after numbers of unsuccessful experiments, strikingly illustrates and enforces the above remarks. besides an acknowledged fact, that the owners of factories are often among the most extensive purchasers at the halls, where they buy from the domestic clothier the established articles of manufacture, or are able at once to answer a great and sudden order; while at home, and under their own superintendance, they make their fancy goods, and any articles of a newer, more costly, or more delicate quality, to which they are enabled by the domestic system to apply a much larger proportion of their capital. Thus, the two systems, instead of rivalling, are mutual aids to each other; each supplying the other's defects, and promoting the other's prosperity.

It is

The committee, therefore, feel it to be their duty to recommend the repeal of the 2d and 3d of Phil. and Mary, or the Weavers' Act.

The 5th of Eliz. c. 4, may be said to controul the manufacturer in the making of his cloth, inasmuch as it prescribes the peculiar description of persons who shall alone be suffered to employ either themselves or others in the woollen manufacture; by prohibiting the engaging or working in it to all who have not served a regular apprenticeship under indentures, or as apprentices (for the acts make this distinction) for the term of seven years.

The system of apprenticeship is obviously more congenial with the domestic than the factory system; and therefore your committee were not surprised to find that it has maintained its ground more generally in the North than in the West of England, where, however, a practice of a similar kind and under a peculiar name (that of colting) has pretty generally prevailed; but rather, as your committee understand, from custom, than from a

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »