Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB

that was shown me the other day in the Birmingham Workhouse of a Merit Ward. It seemed a humane and progressive step, yet, as someone said to me about it, "Of course, these things have two sides." Of course they have, and those who understand both sides have here a valuable opportunity of observing the way in which such experiments react on other parts of the system, and so of contributing to the advance of the science of administration generally.

Of outside movements from which it is impossible to keep Poor Law apart I may quote, as a conspicuous instance, the present agitation for the State institution of old-age pensions. I say nothing about its merits here. I merely mention it, to illustrate the range of subjects which those who take the science seriously must endeavour to understand, and to suggest that in the controversy which will inevitably rage over it there is no body of men who have more right to be heard, and, if their opinions are carefully formed in view of all the best knowledge which is to hand, who will have more influence on the ultimate decision of the country than the Poor-Law officials.

I have confined myself in this address to the Science of Poor Relief. I have wished to keep sentiment out. But this is not because I hold that we ought to keep sentiment out of these things. What those who talk about science here want is not that people should not feel about them, but that their feelings should be controlled by their reason. To use an admirable distinction which the infirmary doctor, in Rab and his Friends, draws, we desire that feelings should be motives instead of mere emotions. The things with which you have to do, gentlemen, are mortal-nothing more mortal tn the state of the poor who crowd our workhouses

"mortal things touch us." This, at any rate, was the side on which it came home to me the other day as I passed through the wards in the Dudley Road. These, I felt, are people (in the main) who have lost their chance, for whom life is already gone. They exist. They exist under circumstances which, compared with much we see outside, are even comfortable. Yet what they have missed! How apart they seem; how destitute of all that makes life sweet to others at their age or in their condition!

“The little nameless, unremembered acts
Of kindness and of love."

And as I left I could not help asking what was the lesson of it all. To many the answer might seem easy: Why, of course, to improve their lot for the rest of their time. I am not going to say that this should not be done. Yet, as my friend said, "There are two sides to it." And is not the true lesson rather to try how we may bring this sort of thing to an end in the fewest number of human generations? how we can so deal with our social problems that as the century goes on fewer and fewer will be reduced to this state of hopeless dependence on a stranger's bounty? This seems an end not unworthy of your enthusiasm, a hope that may sustain men in otherwise sometimes dreary work. But how to further this end? I shall conclude with an illustration and a summary of the answer to which what I have here tried to say seems to point.

There is a well-known principle in the scientific dealing with a problem called indirection-the principle that the shortest road to an end is not always the most direct, that you may effect a purpose by indirect more readily than by direct methods. We were

all admiring recently Lord Roberts's brilliant application of this method in standing out against the pressure that was brought to bear upon him to march straight to the relief of Ladysmith. He knew of something better than that. By striking at the heart of the country he was able, in a far more effectual way, to bring relief to the beleaguered troops. These things are an allegory. Methods of poor relief which seem to the sentimentalist mere inconsiderate harshness may prove in the end the most merciful and truly charitable. What, in more detail, does this mean? It means—

1. That we hold fast by the truth we have painfully proved that society as a whole is in a much more hopeful condition than in the ante-reform days was generally assumed-the truth that the body social under normal circumstances is able to support its able-bodied constituents. The poor we have with us, but we have no longer any excuse for believing, as part of the "religion of mercy," that they must always remain with us. Our new creed, on the contrary, is that better education and wiser administration may leave few or none to the public care who are not organically defective and incapable of caring for themselves.

2. It means that we must hold equally fast by the truth that the money and energy saved by stricter administration may with wisdom be directed, meantime at all events, not to saving the rates, but to saving the children. No possible harm, but every good, will be done by unstinted effort to provide the children of the State with the best possible start in life, and thus to stop the stream of pauperism at its source.

3. We must accept the teaching that except in the important case just mentioned the Poor Law can have

little to do with positive attempts to keep people out of the workhouse, or to reinstate them in the ranks of the self-supporting. For these services we must rely in the main upon voluntary agencies. But these, if they are to accomplish their purpose, must take to heart far more seriously than they have hitherto shown much inclination to do, the call addressed to them alike by common sense and common humanity to educate and organise themselves for this vital service to the country.

MODERN METHODS OF TEMPERANCE

REFORM.1

No apology is necessary for choosing the subject of

Temperance Reform on which to address an audience like the present. Of all single causes of social disorganisation, we should probably agree that intemperance is by far the most outstanding. The expenditure of some £100,000,000 per annum by the working-classes, and the loss through drink and its attendant dissipations of between thirty to fifty days a year per individual worker,2 represent not only an appalling amount of individual poverty and misery, but an economic, political, and (as recent writers have warned us) a military danger to the nation of the first magnitude. Nor do I think I need to apologise for directing your attention to the means of dealing with the problem rather than its pressing importance. There is a passage I seem to remember in the immortal Don Quixote in which the faithful squire, after being soundly belaboured by his enemies, is exhorted by his master to the effect that the reason why he felt that pain all down his back was that the stick which gave it him was of a length to that extent. "God's my life, master," replies Sancho, "as if I could not guess that of my own head! The question is, how to get rid of it." In the same way the question with

1 Lecture to the Birmingham Temperance Association, January, 1902. 2 Recent speech by Mr. John Burns, M.P.

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »