Development of Theology. criticism should not make itself heard. 9 Ad vancing experience, as it disclosed that the world is no plaything of arbitrary wills but an order of fixed law, gradually limited the free play of imagination, and removed the gods to a greater and greater distance. When, therefore, phenomena were seen to group themselves in large genera, with permanent attributes and relations, Polytheism rose out of Fetichism; and when the idea of the unity of the world, and of the general persistency of its laws, began to prevail, theology was inevitably reduced to the conception of one overruling will which, directly or by its ministers, controls the whole movement of things. Up to this point the theological form of thought persisted in one point of view it might even be said that, up to this point, it was strengthening its hold upon men. For, every successive concentration of the divine power made the idea of it a firmer and more comprehensive bond of social order, until at length the levelling and organizing genius of Rome laid the foundation of the universal empire, and Christian Monotheism broke down the walls of division between races and nations. Y The decay of But this apparent advance of the theological theology. spirit was illusive, for it was really due to an must, in the long The concentration intellectual movement, which no longer. Victory of Metaphysic. 11 When this point was reached, it was not difficult to see that the whole anthropomorphic explanation of things was on the eve of disappearing. A God, who was nearer man in the past than he is in the present, could not be the God of the future. social order connected But even before this period, the growing weak- And of the ness of the theoretical basis of belief had begun with it. to affect the practical life of men. The social order was built upon theology, and therefore the advance of the critical spirit was continually loosening its foundations. Hence the fierce hostility of the representatives of that order to the freedom of the intelligence. That hostility, however, is to be attributed not so much to their indignation at unbelief in itself, as to their alarm at the dissolution of social order which was its practical result. Nor was it altogether inexcusable, so long as the assailants of the old faith were unable to propound any theoretical principles which could be made the basis of reconstruction. Now the metaphysical principles to which these assailants appealed were really negations pretending to be affirmations, the purely negative character of which must reveal itself The metaphysical system Men in as soon as their victory was achieved. The truth of this view will be more clearly of thought. seen if we examine the nature of that intermediate system of critical thought which was the great weapon of attack upon theology. This system was, in fact, only the last abstraction of the theological anthropomorphism itself. As in one department of human thought after another the knowledge of the uniform and unchangeable order of things prevailed over the conception of accident Weakness of Metaphysic. 13 and arbitrary change, the idea of will became attenuated, until it ultimately disappeared altogether from the explanation of nature. But it left behind a kind of spectre of abstraction. Instead of being dominated by gods, phenomena were supposed to be dominated by essences and powers, which, however, were merely abstract repetitions of those phenomena. How abstractions came to be thus substantiated as real entities, separate from the phenomena in which they were manifested, might be difficult to understand, if we did not remember that they were but the residua of what had once been individualized pictures of imagination. The essences of the Schoolmen were but the dry bones of the living creatures of poetry which the understanding had slain. "The human mind," as Mill puts it, "did not set out from the notion of a name, but from that of a divinity. The realization of abstractions was not the embodiment of a word, but the disembodiment of a Fetich." Really, therefore, these. essences and powers were nothing more than the pure abstractions, and therefore only the negations, of the gods whose places they took. no positive content of their own. They had As mere |