The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court DecisionsYale University Press, 1 янв. 2008 г. - Всего страниц: 262 Despite the United States' ban on slave importation in 1808, profitable interstate slave trading continued. The nineteenth century's great cotton boom required vast human labour to bring new lands under cultivation, and many thousands of slaves were torn from their families and sold across state lines in distant markets. Shocked by the cruelty and extent of this practice, abolitionists called upon the federal government to exercise its constitutional authority over interstate commerce and outlaw the interstate selling of slaves. This groundbreaking book is the first to tell the complex story of the decades-long debate and legal battle over federal regulation of the slave trade. David Lightner explores a wide range of constitutional, social, and political issues that absorbed antebellum America. He revises accepted interpretations of various historical figures, including James Madison, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and Abraham Lincoln, and he argues convincingly that southern anxiety over the threat to the interstate slave trade was a key precipitant to the secession of the South and the Civil War. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 28
Стр. 13
... considered good presidents, and the Supreme Court decisions they opposed have not fared well in the judgment of history. But the rhetoric of judicial activism has been deployed by those who ended up on the losing side of history as well ...
... considered good presidents, and the Supreme Court decisions they opposed have not fared well in the judgment of history. But the rhetoric of judicial activism has been deployed by those who ended up on the losing side of history as well ...
Стр. 14
... considered correct. Much the same can be said of many of the Supreme Court decisions of the 1960s that broadened the constitutional protections for criminal defendants: they were intensely controversial at the time, and some critics ...
... considered correct. Much the same can be said of many of the Supreme Court decisions of the 1960s that broadened the constitutional protections for criminal defendants: they were intensely controversial at the time, and some critics ...
Стр. 47
... considered one of the most important current battles over how the Constitution should be interpreted. In what follows, I will briefly set out the debate and then explain why I think its significance is drastically overstated. The ...
... considered one of the most important current battles over how the Constitution should be interpreted. In what follows, I will briefly set out the debate and then explain why I think its significance is drastically overstated. The ...
Стр. 53
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Стр. 54
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Содержание
1 | |
9 | |
Part II Easy Cases | 63 |
Part III Hard Cases | 87 |
Part IV Illegitimacy | 167 |
Part V Striking the Balance | 227 |
Notes | 237 |
Index | 247 |
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions Kermit Roosevelt Ограниченный просмотр - 2006 |
The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions Kermit Roosevelt Ограниченный просмотр - 2008 |
The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions Kermit Roosevelt Просмотр фрагмента - 2006 |
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
abortion accept action activism adopted allow Amendment American answer applications approach appropriate argued argument asserted attempt authority balancing basis benefits better Black branches Brown burdens Bush chapter citizens claim clear concerned Congress considered Constitution costs counts created critics decide decisions deference deferential determine different discrimination discuss doctrine Dred Due Process enforcement Equal Protection Clause Executive exist fact factors federal first give given governmental important individual interest issue judges judgment judicial Justice lead legislative legislature legitimate less liberty limits majority marriage meaning ment offered opinion originalism particular plain political practices probably prohibits provision punishment question racial ratifiers reason regulate relatively religious respect rule schools Scott seems Senate sense simply speech standard strike suggest Supreme Court things tion understanding United University Press values violated vote women