The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court DecisionsYale University Press, 1 янв. 2008 г. - Всего страниц: 262 Despite the United States' ban on slave importation in 1808, profitable interstate slave trading continued. The nineteenth century's great cotton boom required vast human labour to bring new lands under cultivation, and many thousands of slaves were torn from their families and sold across state lines in distant markets. Shocked by the cruelty and extent of this practice, abolitionists called upon the federal government to exercise its constitutional authority over interstate commerce and outlaw the interstate selling of slaves. This groundbreaking book is the first to tell the complex story of the decades-long debate and legal battle over federal regulation of the slave trade. David Lightner explores a wide range of constitutional, social, and political issues that absorbed antebellum America. He revises accepted interpretations of various historical figures, including James Madison, Harriet Beecher Stowe, and Abraham Lincoln, and he argues convincingly that southern anxiety over the threat to the interstate slave trade was a key precipitant to the secession of the South and the Civil War. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 1 – 5 из 19
Стр. 2
... counts as activism. The Supreme Court confirmation hearings, sadly, did not help us with this second issue. No one explained how to identify activism in any objective way, and the nominees res- olutely refused to offer anything more ...
... counts as activism. The Supreme Court confirmation hearings, sadly, did not help us with this second issue. No one explained how to identify activism in any objective way, and the nominees res- olutely refused to offer anything more ...
Стр. 24
... count. I call it “institutional competence.” Institutional. Competence. With respect to the question of whether a particular discrim- inatory law is motivated by hostility, the legislature that enacts that law is obviously in a better ...
... count. I call it “institutional competence.” Institutional. Competence. With respect to the question of whether a particular discrim- inatory law is motivated by hostility, the legislature that enacts that law is obviously in a better ...
Стр. 41
... counts as an abridgment ( firing a government employee ? ) , or even what counts as speech ( art ? dance ? nude dance ? ) . In fact , the kinds of people who talk about judicial activism tend to make very little effort to explain how a ...
... counts as an abridgment ( firing a government employee ? ) , or even what counts as speech ( art ? dance ? nude dance ? ) . In fact , the kinds of people who talk about judicial activism tend to make very little effort to explain how a ...
Стр. 53
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Стр. 54
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Содержание
1 | |
9 | |
Part II Easy Cases | 63 |
Part III Hard Cases | 87 |
Part IV Illegitimacy | 167 |
Part V Striking the Balance | 227 |
Notes | 237 |
Index | 247 |
Другие издания - Просмотреть все
The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions Kermit Roosevelt Ограниченный просмотр - 2006 |
The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions Kermit Roosevelt Ограниченный просмотр - 2008 |
The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions Kermit Roosevelt Просмотр фрагмента - 2006 |
Часто встречающиеся слова и выражения
abortion activist affirmative action allow American anti-deferential applications appropriate argued argument asserted Black Brown burdens Bush Casey chapter citizens claim commerce Congress consensus constitutional meaning costs and benefits Court decisions critics decide deference deferential detainees discrimination discuss dissenting doctrinal rule doctrinal test doctrine and meaning Dred Scott Due Process Clause Eighth Amendment enforcement Equal Protection Clause Establishment Clause Executive fact factors federal government Florida Florida Supreme Court Fourteenth Amendment gay marriage gays and lesbians Gore Hamdi homosexual Ibid illegitimate interest issue judges judgment judicial activism Justice justified Kelo Korematsu legislative legislature legitimacy legitimate liberty Lochner Mark Levin Men in Black ment Miranda opinion originalists plain meaning Plessy political prohibits provision punishment question racial minorities Rasul ratifiers reason religious Romer Scalia segregation speech standard stitution strict scrutiny substantial suggest Supreme Court tion understanding University Press uphold violated vote women