Libel Law
Spanish Revolution.-What is the fate that will probably attend our Army in
Spain?-1, for my part, shall think that we are lucky if we avoid a Capi-
tulation. What diversion has Sir J. Moore made in favour of the Spa-
niards? The sort of diversion that would have been made by Lord-
Cochrane. Our Army costs us 23 millions of pounds sterling a year.
The regular Infantry in July last amounted to 100,000, and the Cavalry
to 25.000 men. What is this Army for? There can be no maintainable
justification for the measures, or the inactivity which have led to the known
dreadful situation of our Army. Have not this suffering people a right
to demand a knowledge of the cause of this great injury and dis-
grace?
Loyalty."-Not vulgar Loyalty, but Loyalty in the modern sense of that Word.
-Proofs of this most estimable quality in the Viscount Castlereagh, and
some of his Relations.-Three Millions drawn from the Public, during
the last 30 or 40 years, by six or seven Persons! There's Loyalty for
you! "Jacobins and Levellers blush for shame!" " Jack Cades" hide
your heads.-Real Services of the Cochrane Family
Spanish Revolution.-The dismal news is at last arrived. My Readers, at any
rate, have from the first been prepared for what has happened.-Jocula-
rity of the publications which have been made in the Ministerial papers
under the title of Speeches made by Lord Castlereagh and Mr. Canning.
-But, while Rome burnt, Nero fiddled; and it is universally true, that
the Monkey and the Tyger meet in the same mind.-Shall no disgrace
attend those who, having all the means of the Country in their hands,planned
the Campaign of Leon and Galicia? It is grossly false to say that the
Spanish Nation did not wish to be freed from Oppression: we never made
them the offer. We royalized the Cause of Spain, and made it a contest
between King Ferdinand and Joseph.-Dismal close of the Campaign.—
Let us never lose sight of this important truth, that to induce a People to
rise in arms against a powerful Invader, they must first, not be told, but
be made to feel, that they have a Country to fight for
West India Docks
DUKE OF YORK.-Mr. Wardle's Motion " for the Appointment of a Committee,
to inquire into the Conduct of the Commander in Chief, with regard to
Promotions and Exchanges in the Army."-The important DEBATE of the
27th Jan. thercon.-Observations on the said Debate. Mr. Wardle's
Speech at once concise, plain, and impressive.—Sir James Pulteney (who
marched against Ferrol), and others, extol the excellent Discipline of the
Army. Mr. Adam informs the House that "he had been for 20 Years ac-
quainted with all the Duke's embarrassments, &c." And that therefore
the Accusation must be false.-This Conclusion rather illogical.-The
heavy responsibility," to which Mr. Wardle had subjected himself.-Mr.
Canning asserts" that Infamy must attach either upon the Accused or the
Accuser."-A" Conspiracy," said to be on foot, for the purpose of talking
and writing down the Duke of York, the Army itself, and all the Esta-
blishments of the Country.-Proofs of the said Conspiracy.-Messrs. Yorke
and Canning assert, that there had been a series of Libels published against
the Duke of York.-No man's character white-washed by an appeal to the
Law." The Blessings of a Free Press."-" What is Freedom of the
Press?" The Writers of former times surpassed in boldness those of the
present day. Instances thereof, from the Works of Pope.-Why not put