Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB

who was the most important "ambassador" at the court of St. James. A European member of the diplomatic corps, to whom the inquiry was addressed, promptly responded, "The American minister." From time to time, however, American representatives abroad, wishing to enjoy the ceremonial privileges of the ambassadorial rank, recommended its creation; and eventually their recommendation was adopted. But it was done without any increase of compensation, so that to-day none but a man of fortune can afford to be an American ambassador. When we scan the list of those who have thus far held the position, it is not difficult to believe that the Republic has as yet suffered no detriment by reason of this moral limitation upon the choice of its agents; but the creation of conditions under which persons of moderate means are excluded from the highest public employments, except at a sacrifice which they can ill afford to make or cannot make at all, is not in harmony with what have been conceived to be American ideals.

To this incongruity it is within the power of Congress at any time to apply a corrective; but there is yet another innovation the remedy for which lies with the executive branch of the government. Among the extraordinary privileges commonly said to belong to the ambassador, by reason of his representing the "person" of the "sovereign," is that of personal audience on matters of business with

the head of the state. In Europe, with the substitution of constitutional governments for absolute monarchies, this privilege has become merely nominal, but in Washington it has been revived in something like its pristine rigor, direct intercourse with the President, without regard to the Secretary of State, being constantly demanded and practised. In the days when the highest rank was that of envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary, the privilege of transacting diplomatic business directly with the President was rarely accorded to a foreign minister, not only because the time of the President was supposed to be already sufficiently occupied, but also because the White House is not an office of record, the custodian of the diplomatic archives being the Secretary of State, who is the legal organ and adviser of the President in foreign affairs, and who, by reason of his preoccupation with the business of his own department, is supposed to possess that mastery of its details which is so essential to the care of public as well as of private interests. The President, with his multifarious duties and responsibilities, is certainly entitled to all the freedom of discretion which the rulers of other countries enjoy with regard to the direct management of diplomatic business.

But without regard to methods, which from time to time may change, there is no doubt that the importance of the United States as a factor, not in

the "concert of Europe," but in that wider concert which embraces all civilized powers, Eastern as well as Western, is destined to grow. In 1871 a conference at Washington, presided over by the Secretary of State, resulted in the conclusion of a permanent truce between Spain and the allied republics on the west coast of South America, thus formally ending an unfortunate conflict in the Western Hemisphere. In 1905 the whole world rings with praise of the President of the United States, who, quick to seize the critical moment, successfully interposed for the termination of the titanic struggle between Russia and Japan in the Far East. In his triumph there was no doubt a large personal element. But it is also true that from his fortunate station he was able to speak on this occasion with an impartial and authoritative benevolence which no other ruler could invoke. The results afford a convincing proof of the nation's power; and not merely of its power, but also of the exercise of that highest influence which proceeds not so much from material forces as from the pursuit of those elevated policies that have identified American diplomacy with the cause of freedom and justice.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ADAMS, HENRY, History of the United States during the Administrations of Jefferson and Madison. 9 volumes, New York, 1889-1891.

ADAMS, JOHN QUINCY, Memoirs, Comprising Portions of His Diary from 1795 to 1848. 12 volumes, Philadelphia, 1874-1877.

Allen, Gardner W., Our Navy and the Barbary Corsairs. Boston and New York, 1904.

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, The Foreign Policy of the United States, Political and Commercial. Philadelphia, 1899. The United States and Latin America. Philadelphia, 1903.

BACOURT, ADOLPHE DE, Souvenirs d'un Diplomate: Lettres Intimes sur l'Amérique. Paris, 1882.

Bancroft, Frederic, Life of William H. Seward.

2 vol

umes, New York, 1900. BANCROFT, GEORGE, History of the Formation of the Constitu

tion of the United States of America. New York, 1885. BARBÉ MARBOIS, FRANÇOIS, MARQUIS DE, The History of Louisiana, particularly of the Cession of that Colony to the United States of America, with an Introductory Essay on the Constitution and Government of the United States. Lawrence's translation, Philadelphia, 1830. BEMIS, GEORGE, American Neutrality: its Honorable Past, its Expedient Future. Boston, 1866.

BERNARD, MOUNTAGUE, A Historical Account of the Neutrality of Great Britain during the American Civil War. London, 1870.

CHANNING and HART, Guide to the Study of American History. Boston, 1897.

Compilation of Reports of Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, 1789-1901. Senate Executive Documents, 231, 56th Congress, 2d Session, pts. I to 8.

CUSHING, CALEB, The Treaty of Washington: its Negotiation, Execution, and the Discussions relating thereto. New York, 1873.

DONIOL, HENRI, Histoire de la Participation de la France à l'Établissement des Etats-Unis d'Amérique. Correspondance Diplomatique et Documents. 5 volumes, Paris, 1886-1892.

FOSTER, JOHN WATSON, A Century of American Diplomacy, 1776-1876. Boston, 1900.

American Diplomacy in the Orient. Boston, 1903.

HART, ALBERT BUSHNELL, Hand-book of the History, Diplo macy, and Government of the United States. Cambridge,

1901.

The Foundations of American Foreign Policy. New York, 1901.

HENDERSON, JOHN B., JR., American Diplomatic Questions. New York, 1901.

LATANÉ, JOHN HOLLADAY, The Diplomatic Relations of the United States and Spanish America. Baltimore, 1900. LYMAN, THEODORE, The Diplomacy of the United States, being an Account of the Foreign Relations of the Country, from the first Treaty with France in 1778. 2d edition, 2 volumes, Boston, 1828.

MAHAN, ALFRED THAYER, The Problem of Asia and its Effect on International Policies. Boston, 1900.

MOORE, JOHN BASSETT, History and Digest of the International Arbitrations to which the United States has been a

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »