...words, for it seems to me to be lacking in clearness to say the least, that "in a democracy you cannot build a nation inside of a nation of two antagonistic...and therefore the future American must be either an Anglo-Saxon or a mulatto." This mixing up of the marriage relation with other social relations runs...

...articulated most vividly by the Reverend John Durham: "7n a Democracy you cannot build a nation inside a nation of two antagonistic races; and therefore the future American must be either an Anglo-Saxon or a Mulatto." The test of a man's belief in equality, Durham later asserts, is "giving...

...insisted—sometimes as a rhetorical question, sometimes as an answer—that "in a Democracy you cannot build a nation inside of a nation of two antagonistic...and therefore the future American must be either an AngloSaxon or a Mulatto" (LS, 201, 242, 383, 433). Griggs's fictional Imperium originates as a "patriotic...

...Durham, the Baptist minister of Hambright, North Carolina, explains that "in a Democracy you can not build a nation inside of a nation of two antagonistic races, and therefore the future American must either be an Anglo Saxon or a Mulatto. And if a Mulatto, will the future be worth discussing?" As long...

...author italicises the following sentence and other« of similar import. "In a democracy you cannot build a nation inside of a nation, of two antagonistic...American must be either an Anglo Saxon or a Mulatto." It is the keynote to the book and fresh from the reading of the book one doea not feel like denying...

...Dixon has italicized and developed as the text of his novel is extreme: "In a Democracy you cannot build a nation inside of a nation of two antagonistic...and therefore the future American must be either an Anglo-Saxon or a Mulatto." In expounding this he makes use of all the bitter hatred of the negro, which...