ignore; and invent another power which is but an allegory, and has only a verbal existence, and yet they scruple not to say that they can see no limit to THIS POWER (Natural Selection) in slowly and beautifully adapting each form to the most complex relations of life' (502).*

This advantage, then, at any rate, we have in arguing with Mr Darwin, that we believe there really is a Power that can, and has done, all these things, by supreme exercise of intellect and will; Mr Darwin does not believe this, and yet he continually is making use of language implying that he does believe it.

The explanation of this is, that he feels by the force of reason that to be necessary and indispensable which his Theory condemns.

This great question of design brings us ultimately to the beginning of life, which Mr Darwin calls the Origin of Species, and which it is the professed object of his book to explain. In this, as we have seen, he has failed, as he has only explained up to a certain point, which does not reach the origin. He tells us of a primordial spore of the lowest algæ from which all animal and vegetable life was evolved, but the origin of the great parent he leaves untouched.

It is, however, a remarkable circumstance that in the edition of his work of the year 1859, from which Professor Phillips has made his quotations, and from which many

Every naturalist who has dissected some of the beings as now ranked very low in the scale, must have been struck with their really wondrous and beautiful organization (135).

เ

Whenever the period of activity comes on, the adaptation of the larvæ to its conditions of life is just as perfect and beautiful as in the adult animal' (472).

others have made theirs, there was some further information on this subject which has been since withdrawn. In the edition of 1859 we read it thus: All living things have much in common in their chemical composition, &c. ; therefore I should infer from analogy that the organic beings which have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form into which life was first breathed.' All the words from therefore' to the end of the sentence, have been suppressed in the subsequent editions; and in addition to this a long paragraph ending with this sentence, there is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers having been originally breathed into a few forms or one; and that whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms, most beautiful and most wonderful, have been, and are being evolved.'

With this statement we should inquire, of course, how was life breathed into the first forms: surely, in a point of the system of such transcendent importance, Mr Darwin cannot here also be talking allegorically-he must have meant what he says, that life was breathed from a source that had power to give it. to give it. Whether there was an allusion here to the language of the Scripture, must be left to surmise, but certain it is that the whole paragraph is cancelled, and that we now read the important sentence thus: Therefore on the principle of Natural Selection with divergence of character, it does not seem incredible, that from some such low and intermediate form, as the lower algæ, both animals and plants may have been developed-and if we admit this, we must admit that all organic beings which have ever lived on this earth may have descended from some one primordial form' (519).

Now all this is very curious as showing how the author of this Theory is unsettled on the main point, the Origin of Species. At first, as he saw the necessity of an original mover and a real commencement of life, we were informed that life was breathed' into the first forms; but subsequently, and in consequence perhaps of perceiving that this statement was a virtual contradiction of the Theory, we are told that all life descended from one form-leaving that one form to acquire life as best it might.

The Theory, therefore, is in a more consistent dress at present, and does not contradict itself at starting; but it is far more absurd, for we now see the origin of all things traced to a sea-weed, which of course sprung from another sea-weed, and so on backwards for millions of millions of ages, for sea-weeds either sprung from some other form, and therefore they cannot be the first themselves, or they existed for ever without beginning, or they were created.

There is, however, another alternative—and it is that of spontaneous generation. M. Pouchet-who is a Transmutationist of the School of Lamarck-pure, and without admixture, openly defies the scientific world to find any other alternative; either creation, says he, which is a miracle, or successive evolution of Lamarck.' Now this successive evolution is from spontaneous generation, and of this doctrine M. Pouchet is a conspicuous advocate. Nevertheless, he is quite right in his logic, that there is no other alternative. Mr Darwin,† however, does not accept spon

*Nous defions qu'on sorte de cette alternative, ou la création instantanée et miraculeuse d'un certain nombre d'animaux parfaits, ou l'évolution successive, c'est à dire l'idée de Lamarck, modifiée dans le sens des connaissances nouvelles que resument à notre époque, d'un coté la geologie, et de l'autre l'anatomie philosophique.'-Pouchet, La pluralité des races humaines, 182.'

† 'Lamarck was led to suppose that new and simple forms were con

taneous generation, and therefore has no origin for his system. His elephant stands upon a tortoise, and the tortoise upon nothing.

tinually being produced by spontaneous generation! I need hardly say that science in her present state does not countenance the belief that living creatures are now ever produced from inorganic matter' (135).

CHAPTER XVI.

THE CONCLUSION.

We have thus touched on the most important points of Mr Darwin's Theory, though it would have required a largely extended work to meet the numerous secondary arguments and collateral disquisitions in the Origin of Species.' The reader will remember that the main propositions of this Theory are:

1. That no organic being has been created.

2. That every plant and animal has been made by accidental minute changes taking place in the organization of antecedent forms.

3. That these changes, beneficial in result, but not in intention, have given the possessor an advantage in the struggle for life. The organized being with the advantageous accidental change has been enabled to live; the plant or animal not so favoured has been exterminated.

4. No plant or animal has been designed for any particular object or place in nature, but all have taken such a place as was open to them, and have maintained themselves as well as they can in their position.

5. Every existing plant or animal is struggling to maintain its place in nature. If others, near them in habits,