ham had. It appears, therefore, that Charles himself must have been deceived. The multiplied delays of the dispensation, though they arose from accident, afforded Buckingham a plausible pretext for charging the Spaniards with insincerity. NOTE FFF, p. 486. Among other particulars, he mentions a sum of eighty thousand pounds borrowed from the king of Denmark. In a former speech to the parliament, he told them that he had expended five hundred thousand pounds in the cause of the palatine, besides the voluntary contributions given him by the people. See Franklyn, p. 50. But what is more extraordinary, the treasurer, in order to show his own. good services, boasts to the parliament, that by his contrivance sixty thousand pounds had been saved in the article of exchange in the sums remitted to the palatine. This seems a great sum; nor is it easy to conceive whence the king could procure such vast sums as would require a sum so considerable to be paid in exchange. From the whole, however, it appears, that the king had been far from neglecting the interests of his daughter and son-in-law, and had even gone far beyond what his narrow revenue could afford. NOTE GGG, p. 486. How little this principle had prevailed during any former period of the English government, particularly during the last reign, which was certainly not so perfect a model of liberty as most writers would represent it, will easily appear from many passages in the history of that reign. But the ideas of men were much changed during about twenty years of a gentle and peaceful administration. The commons, though James of himself had recalled all patents of monopolies, were not contented without a law against them, and a declaratory law too; which was gaining a great point, and establishing principles very avorable to liberty: but they were extremely grateful when Elizabeth, upon petition, (after having once refused their requests,) recalled A few of the most oppressive patents, and employed some soothing expressions towards them. The parliament had surely reason, when they confessed, in the seventh of James, that he allowed them more freedom of debate than ever was indulged by any of his predecessors. His indulgence in this particular, joined to his easy temper, was probably one cause of the great power assumed by the commons. Monsieur de la Boderie, in his despatches, (vol. i. p. 449,) mentions the liberty of speech in the house of commons as a new practice. NOTE HHH, p. 491. Rymer, tom. xviii. p. 224. It is certain that the young prince of Wales, afterwards Charles II., had Protestant governors from his early Infancy; first the earl of Newcastle, then the marquis of Hertford, The king, in his memorial to foreign churches after the commencement of the civil wars, insists on his care in educating his children in the Protestant religion, as a proof that he was nowise inclined to the Catholic. Rush. vol. v. p. 752. It can scarcely, therefore, be questioned, but this article, which has so odd an appearance, was inserted only to amuse the pope, and was never intended by either party to be executed. NOTE III, p. 499. "Monarchies," according to Sir Walter Raleigh, "are of two sorts touching their power or authority, viz. 1. Entire, where the whole power of ordering all state matters, both in peace and war, doth by law and custom appertain to the prince, as in the English kingdom; where the prince hath the power to make laws, league, and war, to create magistrates, to pardon life, of appeal, etc. Though to give a contentment to the other degrees, they have a suffrage in making laws, yet ever subject to the prince's pleasure and negative will. 2. Limited or restrained, that hath no full power in all the points and matters of state, as the military king that hath not the sovereignty in time of peace, as the making of laws, etc., but in war only, as the Polonian king." Maxims of State. And a little after: "In every just state, some part of the government is, or ought to be, imparted to the people, as in a kingdom, a voice and suffrage in making laws; and sometimes also of levying of arms, (if the charge be great, and the prince forced to borrow help of his subjects,) the matter rightly may be propounaed to a parliament, that the tax may seem to have proceeded from themselves. So consultations and some proceedings in judicial matters may in part be referred to them. The reason, lest, seeing themselves to be in no number nor of reckoning, they mislike the state or government.” This way of reasoning differs little from that of King James, who considered the privileges of the parliament as matters of grace and indulgence, more than of inheritance. It is remarkable that Raleigh was thought to lean towards the Puritanical party, notwithstanding these positions. But ideas of government change much in different times. Raleigh's sentiments on this head are still more openly expressed in his Prerogatives of Parliaments, a work not published till after his death. It is a dialogue between a courtier, or counsellor, and a country justice of peace, who represents the patriot party, and defends the highest notion of liberty which the principles of that age would bear. Here is a passage of it: "Counsellor. That which is done by the king, with the advice of his private or privy council, is done by the king's absolute power. Justice. And by whose power is it done in parliament but by the king's absolute power? Mistake it not, my lord: the three estates do but advise as the privy council doth; which advice if the king embrace, it becomes the king's own act in the one, and the king's law in the other," etc. The earl of Clare, in a private letter to his son-in-law, Sir Thomas Wentworth, afterwards earl of Strafford, thus expresses himself: "We live under a prerogative government, where book law submits to lex loquens." He spoke from his own and all his ancestors' experience. There was no single instance of power which a king of England might not at that time exert, on pretence of necessity or expediency: the continuance alone, or frequent repetition of arbitrary administration, might prove dangerous, for want of force to support it. It is remarkable, that this letter of the earl of Clare was written in the first year of Charles's reign; and consequently must be meant of the general genius of the government, not the spirit or temper of the monarch. See Strafford's Letters, vol. i. p. 32. From another letter in the same collection, (vol. p. 10,) it appears that the council sometimes assumed the power of forbidding persons dis: greeable to the court to stand in the elections. This authority they could exert in some instances; but we are not thence to infer, that they could shut the door of that house to every one who was not acreptable to them. The genius of the ancient government reposed more trust in the king, than to entertain any such suspicion; and it allowed scattered instances of such a kind, as would have been totally destructive of the constitution, had they been continued without interruption. I I have not met with any English writer in that age who sperks of England as a limited monarchy, but as an absolute one, where the people have many privileges. That is no contradiction. In all European monarchies the people have privileges; but whether dependent or independent on the will of the monarch, is a question that in most governments it is better to forbear. Surely that question was not determined before the age of James. The rising spirit of the Į arliament, together with that king's love of general, speculative prin iples, brought it from its obscurity, and made it be commonly canv issed. The strongest testimony that I remember from a writer of Ji mes's age in favor of English liberty, is in Cardinal Bentivoglio, a fore gner, who mentions the English government as similar to that of the Low Country provinces under their princes, rather than to that of Fra ice or Spain. Englishmen were not so sensible that their prince was li aited, because they were sensible that no individual had any security against a stretch of prerogative: but foreigners, by comparison, could pe ceive that these stretches were at that time, from custom or other causes, less frequent in England than in other monarchies. Philip de Cor lines, too, remarked the English constitution to be more popular in his time than that of France. But in a paper written by a patriot in 16 27, it is remarked, that the freedom of speech in parliament had bee lostin England since the days of Comines. Franklyn, p. 238. He is a stanza of Malherbe's Ode to Mary de Medicis, the queen r. gent, written in 1614. Entre les rois à qui cet age De ne regner pas comme il faut. The English, as well as the Spaniards, are here pointed out as much more obedient subjects than the French, and much more tractabl, and submissive to their princes. Though this passage be taken fi ›m a poet, every man of judgment will allow its authority to be decisive. The character of a national government cannot be unknown in Eu rope; though it changes sometimes very suddenly. Machiavel, in his Dissertations on Livy, says repeatedly, that France was the most legal and most popular monarchy then in Europe. NOTE KKK, p. 499. Passive obedience is expressly and zealously inculcated in the homilies composed and published by authority in the reign of Queen Elizabeth. The convocation, which met in the very first year of the king's reign, voted as high monarchical principles as are contained in the decrees of the University of Oxford during the rule of the Tories. These principles, so far from being deemed a novelty introduced by James's influence, passed so smoothly, that no historian has taken notice of them: they were never the subject of controversy, or dispute, or discourse; and it is only by means of Bishop Overall's Convocation Book, printed near seventy years after, that we are acquainted with them. Would James, who was so cautious, and even timid, have ventured to begin his reign with a bold stroke, which would have given just ground of jealousy to his subjects? It appears from that monarch's Basilicon Doron, written while he was in Scotland, that the republican ideas of the origin of power from the people, were at that time esteemed Puritanical novelties. The patriarchal scheme, it is remarkable, is inculcated in those votes of the convocation preserved by Overall; nor was Filmer the first inventor of those absurd notions. NOTE LLL, p. 514. That of the honest historian Stowe seems not to have been of this number. "The great blessings of God," says he, "through increase of wealth in the common subjects of this land, especially upon the citizens of London; such within men's memory, and chiefly within these few years of peace, that, except there were now due mention of some sort made thereof, it would in time to come be held incredible,' etc. In another place, "Amongst the manifold tokens and signs of the infinite blessings of Almighty God bestowed upon this kingdom, by the wondrous and merciful establishing of peace within ourselves, and the full benefit of concord with all Christian nations and others; of all which graces let no man dare to presume he can speak too much; whereof in truth there can never be enough said, neither was there ever any people less considerate and less thankful than at this time, being not willing to endure the memory of their present happiness, as well as in the universal increase of commerce and traffic throughout the kingdom, great building of royal ships and by private merchants, the repeopling of cities, towns, and villages, beside the discernible and sudden increase of fair and costly buildings, as well within the city of London as the suburbs thereof, especially within these twelve years," etc. END OF VOL. IV. Phillips, Sampson, & Co.'s Publications. SARGENT'S STANDARD SERIES O.F READING BOOKS. A new and improved series, by EPES SARGENT, author of the "Standard Speaker.” 5. THE STANDARD FIFTH READER. 4. THE STANDARD FOURTH READER. 3. THE STANDARD THIRD READER, OR GUIDE TO ARTICU LATION. 2. THE STANDARD SECOND READER. Billings. With Illustrations by 1. THE STANDARD PRIMER, OR FIRST READER. With Illustrations by Billings. Mr. Sargent has been several years engaged in the preparation of these works. He has carefully studied all the best European works French, German, and English- theoretical and practical, on the subject of elementary instruction in reading; and has availed himself of the most advanced intelligence in regard to it in the United States. Every well-tested improvement has been adopted, besides some novel features that give this series prominent claims upon the confidence of all persons interested in the cause of education. The Standard Fifth Reader. has been already adopted by very many of the best schools in New England, New York, Pennsylvania, and other principal sections of the country, and has met with a rapid success wholly unparalleled in the case of similar works. Its peculiar features are, the greater variety and novelty of its contents, three fourths of which are to be found in no other Reader; the more careful adaptation of the exercises to the wants and capacities of pupils; the attention given to literary accuracy and style; the system of marks and references in the text, which, without cumbering or disfiguring the page, refer the pupil to the introductory "Principles of Elocution," or to an "Explanatory Index" at the end of the volume, in which all the terms and passages of any difficulty are fully explained. The editor of the Evening Traveller says, "Take it all in all, and we Anow of no book equal to this for teaching a youth to read with correctness and pleasure; and heartily wish it might find a place in every teacher's hands, and in every school in our country where there are pupils sufficiently advanced to profit by its teachings." "By common consent of all intelligent teachers, the Standard Speaker' is placed at the very head of its class. In England it has drawn high encomiums from the London Athenæum, and the rapid sale it has met with in this country is an evidence of its high appreciation in the United States. Mr. Sargent's success with his 'Speaker' has proved him admirably qualified for his present important task.” — Richmond (Va.) Enquirer. TUCKERMAN. GOLDSMITH'S (OLIVER} WORKS. Containing his Poems, Plays, and Essays. With Critical Notes by Dr. AIKIN, and an Introductory Essay by H. T. TUCKERMAN, Esq. 1 vol., 12mo., with Portrait, uniform with Sargent's British Poets. "We know of no edition to be compared with this. With beautiful type and clear paper, it commends itself to all. Mr. Tuckerman's essay is well written." Worcester Palladium. |