Sect. 27. The society has always stood aloof from every
communion-it has been against every sect-every sect has
been against it-the tide of the public opinion set in strongly
against them in the close of the seventeenth century-proofs
their antagonists-sketch of their writings against the Qua-
kers-Hicks-Dr. Owen-Sir Matthew Hale-Faldo-Stalham
-Scandrett-twenty-one divines-three rectors-Leslie-the
bishop of Cork-Keith-Bennet-act of toleration-Francis
Bugg-Dr. Stillingfleet-cause of the public suspicions that
Jesuits were among the earliest Friends-George Fox's Latin
works-his polyglot!
Sect. 28. The result of these able exposures-the feeble ef-
forts of the society to reply their explanations covered with
ambiguities, and full of contradictions against their primitive
writers.
Sect. 29. After some repose under Queen Anne and the first
Georges, the society is alarmed by the able and very tempe-
rate expositions of the bishop of Litchfield and Coventry-
they throw themselves before the king and implore his protec-
tion, as if the good bishop had been going to devour them-
they pledge to the public a full reply-it contained nothing
new-it produced no favourable effect on the public mind.
Sect. 30. Incidents in the history of the later years of the
society uninteresting-their publications are confined to the
insipid journals of a few travelling prophets or prophetesses-
and attacks and defences from disowned members-these prin-
ciples have been about 180 years in operation-their numbers
decrease in Great Britain-their present numbers contrasted
with their number stated in the close of the seventeenth cen-
tury, note-they are supposed, on the whole, to be encreasing
in the U. States-they continue to stand aloof from all chris-
tian intercourse-as a body they decline aiding the Bible so-
cieties, and missionary efforts-the extent of their influence in
aiding to put down the most execrable trade in human flesh-
and in meliorating the condition of some Indian tribes, and of
the African population, note.
Sect. 31. Conclusion: their prophets, though professionally
inspired, found to be ineffective polemics-the society seems
to have looked out for advocates from other quarters-the mo-