Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB

sel's cas› then, and now it is time to make an | they are bound to make reparation. That of example.

[ocr errors]

Armstrong was a just judgment of reparation. Corruption is not taken in that limited sense of taking money' corruption is taking a place of 1500l. per ann. In a common case, brave men, soldiers, condemn a man for delivering up a castle, or fort, because he is afraid to keep it; and they should have known that before he undertook to keep it. There needs not com

Sir John Guise. You are told, We must be guided by the Indemnity in Ch. 2nd's time.' I hope we shall ever be at liberty of judging whether things are well or ill done. There has been something said by a member that a little surprizes me, That if you bring a bill to do right in this case, a court may be erected to give damages out of one man's estate to ano-mon-law, nor statute-law, in the matter; it is ther.' There are crimes that excel others; do you know any thing of a greater degree than this? Where was there more violation of the laws, than in taking away charters? And where more of charters than London? If you will go upon matters, and not persons, must not this of charters be one? There are mixed cases in these things upon the public, and upon persons. This is an extraordinary case, and there must be such remedies applied, that no such thing shall be dared to be attempted for the future.

Mr. Hawles. I have some reason to understand this case. I had leave from this house to attend the lords in this case, to reverse this judgment by writ of error. If the king must give this damage, (at whose suit it was) you must give it him again. Will you make satisfaction in the Bishops case? I am for that too, to every person concerned. There is no remedy but here, and I am for retaining the bill. A parliament was anciently called every year, or oftener. The parliament then was a court of justice, to relieve on extraordinary occasions. There were juries over-awed by judges; Bethel and Cornish took another course, to find honest men; this was complained of, and they must have new juries and officers, and lord Russel suffered upon

it.

You have the Indemnity of Ch. 2. mentioned. This is not a bill of punishment, but a bill of satisfaction, to value wrongs they have done; and you may pardon them for the crimes. If you ask the value of the affection of father and children, they cannot tell what they are; go as far as you can, if these are faulty, and the petitioners may come for satisfaction. It is a reasonable bill, and I hope you will accept it. Would you have a return to what you are delivered from? It is a just bill.

Mr. Hampden. We have a great matter before us in debate, because it is so extraordinary. This matter, it is true, does relate to a common indemnity; but, I think, it is not promoted by justifying every thing that has been done, nor punishing, but to prevent, for the future, the same thing again; and that, if there be not this bill to deter men, they may fall into the same offences. Some men call this a punishment,' and some, 6 a reparation,' but it is in a sense both. Some satisfaction and reparation ought to be made these persons according to natural justice, but it is one thing what a man in conscience ought to do, and what you compel him to do; it is one thing what a man in strict justice is bound to. To make men pay a sum by such a law, I cannot readily consent to it; I have heard nothing fully to satisfy me. This, truly, is an injury done, and, in conscience,

[ocr errors]

against common sense. If you say there is no other law, you will quickly be distinguished out of all your liberties. I am of opinion, therefore, "That the Petition for leave to bring in a Bill, to make reparation to my lord mayor, and the rest of the petitioners, from sir Peter Rich, and others, do lie upon the table;' but not to go barely off so, for they have done notoriously, and I cannot believe that men, able to make a common bargain, should give up their sense and reason in that manner. This was not done only against the city of London, but against the whole kingdom, and if you are not bound to give particular reparation to the persons injured, you are to the public, and, in the mean time, to remove the person, sir Peter Rich, from your company.

Sir Christ. Musgrave. When a bill is brought in for satisfaction of injury done, it is strange that a gentleman should start another question. If you talk of removing people, it is a strange thing. Keep us to a que-tion. This Petition sets out that the petitioners can have no remedy in the Exchequer,' and you are told of the prudence of it. Will it be an act of prudence to give reparation, when they may have it out of the exchequer ? The question is, Whether they shall have a bill, or not a bill?

The Petition was read, and Musgrave was mistaken in the contents.

Sir Robert Rich. I see nothing in the petition as is alleged. I see, virtue is virtue still, though it wants encouragement. It is plain, the petitioners can have no remedy but here, but by an innuendo; therefore pray put the question.

Serjeant Maynard. If these gentlemen will thrust themselves into the office of sheriffs, and have made returns, they have meddled with what they had nothing to do. Whether rightfully sheriffs, or de facto only, that alters the case. Whenever you will have justice against the king, you must go to the exchequer for it. Never so much injury, and no remedy there! When they come there, the barons are bound to give judgment in restitution. Their only way is to send out a writ to the tally-office to pay the money. Upon the whole matter, leave them to have their liberty to have an action of law.

The question for bringing in a Bill to make reparation to the lord mayor, and the rest of the petitioners, out of the Estates of the persons mentioned in the Petition, was carried in the negative, 169 to 152.

An Amendment to the Corporation Bill carried in the Affirmative.] Jan. 23. The house

Protest thereon.] Memorandum, That the lords following, before the putting of the abovesaid question, desired leave to enter their Dis

of lords went into a committee to consider of the Bill, intituled, An Act to restore Corporations to their antient Rights and Privileges.'The house was resumed, and the earl of Mul-sents if the question was carried in the affirmagrave reported, That the committee of the whole house have been upon the first enacting Clause in the Bill; and it is the opinion of the committee, that the words' declared, and were and are illegal,' should not stand in the Bill.Then this question was put, Whether to agree with the committee in leaving out those words? It was resolved in the affirmative, contents 38, proxies 13, in all 51; not content 39, proxies 4, in all 43 *.

tive, and accordingly they do enter their dis sents as follow: 1. That there hath been only two cases cited, in all the law books, to wards the maintaining the Surrender of Corporations, viz. Dyer 273, 282. The opinions in these cases are not upon argument, the first of them, as appears by the Book, needed, and had an act of parliament to confirm it, being denied to be law, in my lord Coke's third report, in the dean and chapter of Norwich's Case, 44 Eliz. The other of them denied to be law by the "When it was brought up to the lords, judges of the King's-bench in Fulcher and Heythe first point in debate was upon the declara- wood's Case in 2 Ch. 1. in Palmer's Reports; tory part, Whether a corporation could be for- and by the express Resolution of the Judges in feited or surrendered. The lord chief justice that case a Corporation cannot, by surrender, Holt, and two other Judges were for the affirma- dissolve itself. 2. Because that Beda, in the time tive, but all the rest for the negative. No pre- of Hen. 5. and the corporation of Newbury, did cedents for the athrmative were brought higher surrender to that king, which was not allowed; than the reign of Henry 8, in which the abbies but the house of commons called upon them to were surrendered; which was at that time so send up members, notwithstanding the said sur great a point of state, that the authority of these render; and, until they petitioned the said precedents seemed not clear enough for regular house, setting forth their inability of supporttimes. The house was so equally divided, that ing that charge, they were not excused; but it went for the bill only by one voice. After the house allowed their petition, and they have which, little doubt was made of the passing the sent none since. 3. The Surrenders in debate act. But now the applications of the Tories being for the intent and purpose of returning were much quickened: they made the king all such parliamentmen whom the king should possible promises; and the promoters of the appoint, was for the subversion of the laws and bill saw themselves exposed to the Corpora- liberties of England, and introducing of Popery tions, which were to feel the effects of this bill and arbitrary government; and that the putso sensibly, that they made as great promises on ting out these words seems to be the justifying their part. The matter was now at a critical of the most horrid action that king James was issue: the passing the bill put the king and the guilty of during his reign; and we humbly connation in the hands of the Whigs; and the re- ceive, a denying the chiefest grievance mentionjecting it, and dissolving the parliament upon it, ed in king William's Declaration when he was was such a trusting to the Tories, and such a prince, and the greatest inducement for the peabreaking with the Whigs, that the king was long ple's taking up arms in defence of their liberties in suspence what to do. He was once very and properties, and Protestant religion, and the near a desperate resolution, he thought he establishing this king upon the throne. (Signed) could not trust the Tories, and he resolved he Bolton, Herbert, Macclesfield, Bedford, Ashwould not trust the Whigs. He imagined, how-burnhamn, Montagu, Vaughan, Stamford, Sidever, that the Tories would be true to the queen, and confide in her, though they would not in him. He therefore resolved to go over to Holland, and leave the government in the queen's hands. Upon this he called together the marquis of Carmarthen, the earl of Shrewsbury, and some few more, and told them that he had a convoy ready, and was resolved to leave all in the queen's hands, since he did not see how he could extricate himself out of the difficulties into which the animosities of parties had brought him. They pressed him vehemently to lay aside all such resolutions, and to comply with the present necessity. Much passion appeared among them; and the debate was so warm, that many tears were shed. In conclusion, the king resolved to change his first design into another better resolution, of going over in person into Ireland, to put an end to the war there. The queen knew nothing of the first design, so reserved was the king to her in a matter that concerned her so nearly. The king's intention

ney."

of going to Ireland, appeared by the preparations, that were ordered; but a great party was formed in both houses to oppose it. Some really apprehended, that the air of that country would be fatal to so weak a constitution; and the jacobites had no mind, that king James should be so much pressed, as he would probably be, if the king went against him in person. It was by concert proposed in both houses on the same day, to prepare an Address to the king against this voyage: so the king, to prevent the address, came to the parliament, and acquainted both houses with his resolution of going in person to Ireland, and as I have' says he, already ventured my life for the preservation of the religion, laws and liberties of this nation, so I am willing again to expose it, to secure you the quiet enjoyment of them." Tindal.

John Ashburnham, esq. created baron Ashburnham May 30, 1689.

[ocr errors][merged small]

the

66

My lords and gentlemen; I am so sensible of the readiness you have shewed to supply me with Money for the carrying on the war I am engaged in, that I am glad of this occasion to give you thanks for your chearful dispatch of that matter, which was absolutely necessary for the common safety. The best return I can make to your kindness is, to assure you, that, as far as it will go, it shall all be employed to the purposes it was given.-It is a very sensible afiliction to me, to see my good people burthened with heavy Taxes; but, since the speedy recovery of Ireland, is, in my opinion, the only means to ease them, and to preserve and honour of the nation, I am repeace solved to go thither in person, and, with the blessing of God Almighty, endeavour to duce that kingdom; that it may no longer be a charge to this. And, as I have already ventured my life for the preservation of the religion, laws, and liberties of this nation; so I am now willing again to expose it, to secure you the quiet enjoyment of them. The spring draws on; and it being requisite I should be early in the field, I must immediately apply my thoughts to the giving orders for the necessary preparations; which that I may have the more leisure to do, I have thought convenient now to put an end to this session."

re

The Parliament dissolved.] Then the Speaker (the lord chief baron Atkins) by his majesty's command prorogued the parliament to the 2nd of April; but on the 6th of Feb. it was dissolved by proclamation; and a new one was summoned to meet on the 20th of March.*

"The king was now reduced to the necessity of taking a bold and decisive step. The hopes and fears of two contending factions rested upon his resolution. They vied with each other in the diligence of their applications, and the liberality of their promises. But the prizes for which they contended were unequal. The one sought only the chance of power, or to preserve the capacity of being admitted to it the other, a monopoly, or exclusive possession of it. Nor was the alternative of equal consequence to the king. The question was not, whether he should prefer one party to another, but whether he should maintain the power of a preference or a choice. If he consented to the bill, he surrendered into the hands of the Whigs, one of the most important branches of his prerogative, the free election of his servants. He consulted with his confidential friends he was perplexed and agitated: he pondered in his mind a desperate purpose. He thought of relinquishing a dignity which he found cumbersome and distressful." Somerville.

:

Proceedings on the General Election.] "The general Election" says Ralph, "became now the general concern. And such was the ferment of the two parties, that it disturbed the whole nation from the bottom to the surface. The press had full employment on both sides, as usual. In the State Tracts we yet see the names of Hampden and Wildman prefixed to a formal defence of the Convention-Parliament: and as this contains the glosses of the Court-Whigs on the late proceedings, so there is another Paper still extant, which, though levelled at the very root of the Tory interest, very artfully upbraids the king with departing from his old friends and his old principles; and, at the same time, endeavours to persuade the public, that his majesty had dissolved the parliament, only to be in a better condition of observing the one, and of making up all breaches with the other. At the end was inserted a list of 150 Tory members, who had voted againt the Abdication: and no care nor cost was wanting to circulate this inflammatory Paper all over the kingdom. The Tories also on their part circulated a list of those who had voted for the Corporation-Bill, who were stigmatized for Republicans, Fanatics, Latitudinarians, or Atheists, as the Tories had been for Jacobites: and under the influence of these mutual reproaches, and every other unfair and corrupt practice, the returns were made on both sides. As to the result of all, it is certain, that though many of the abovementioned list were thrown out, and Whigs were elected in their places, the majority was composed of Tories, as the latter had foretold, in case the Corporation-Bill was rejected. Even the city of London, alienated in affection to the king, by the artifices of the Whigs, as it is represented by bishop Burnet, fell into the court scheme, and returned sir Wm. Turner, sir Samuel Dashwood, sir Wm. Pritchard, and sir Thomas Vernon, who were on the Tory list, in opposition to sir Tho. Pilkington, lord mayor, sir Robert Clayton, sir Patience Ward, and sir Wm. Ashurst, the old members: and though the latter had pretensions to complain of an undue election, and did afterwards prefer a petition accordingly, they found it to no manner of purpose. In short, bp. Burnet makes no scruple to say, 'The Elections went generally for men, who probably would have declared for king James, if they could have known how to manage matters for him.'-The Whigs, however, though soon sensible of their inferiority, did not throw up the cards; but on the contrary, resolved to make their court to the king, at the expence of their adversaries; that is to say, either to oblige them to act as Whigs, and thereby bring them into disgrace and contempt with their party without doors, or from their refusing to do so, to infer they were Jacobites, and, by consequence, to break the new alliance which had been formed between them and the court: and, agreeable to this plan, when the New

*See Appendix, No. iv.

Parliament was on the point of meeting, they set forth a Paper in which they first affected to give a detail of the hopes and views of the disaffected, upon the late Dissolution, and to indicate the steps necessary to be taken, to disappoint them; which were, in substance, to recognize the authority of the late parliament, and the legality and equity of the king's title, and to make some examples of the many criminals in the two late reigns. But though this Paper was calculated to be a sort of Test of his majesty's own conduct, as well as that of his new allies, it was no farther considered at court than it favoured the court views. The Evil Counsellors, against whom the prince of Orange had declared and whom he came over to punish, king William had resolved to forgive; and the party on whose shoulders they stood, seemed now to stand foremost in his majesty's favour."

Sir

Several Changes at Court.] "As if to mortify the Whigs yet farther, two days before the new parliament was to meet, his majesty dismissed the lords Monmouth and Warrington, and sir Henry Capel from the Treasury-Board, and made sir John Lowther first commissioner, who had risen thus high under the patronage of the marquis of Caermarthen. He also removed lord Godolphin; possibly on account of his attachment to the princess of Denmark, and her favourite, lady Marlborough: but continued Mr. Hampden, who had so much the less reason to rapine at Lowther's being placed above him, because he was made chancellor and under-treasurer of the Exchequer. Stephen Fox, and Mr. Thomas Pelham made up the rest of the board, which now consisted of two conformable Whigs, and two as conformable Tories. About the same time also, Herbert, lord Torrington, was removed from the head of the Admiralty, and the earl of Pembroke (who had been the king's embassador extraordinary to the States) was appointed to succeed him. This drew on the resignation of sir Miles Wharton, and Mr. Sacheverel; and, instead of promoting two in their places, the commission was closed with the name of sir John Chichley only. Burnet adds, "That other lesser changes were made in inferior places, so that Whig and Tory were now pretty equally mixed; and both studied to court the king, by making advances upon the Money bills."" FIRST SESSION OF THE SECOND PARLIAMENT OF KING WILLIAM III.

List of the House of Commons.] March 20. This day the New Parliament met at Westminster. The following is a List of the Members of the House of Commons:

A LIST of the HOUSE of COMMONS in the
SECOND PARLIAMENT of King WILLIAM,
March 20, 1689.

[blocks in formation]

William Johnson.
Aldborough, (Yorkshire)
Christopher Tancred,

Sir Michael Wentworth.
Allerton, North,
Sir William Robinson,
Thomas Lascels.
Andover,
Hon. Francis Pawlet,
John Pollen.
Anglesea,
Richard visc. Bulkley.
Appleby,

Hon. William Cheyne,
Charles Boyle.
Arundel,
James Butler,
John Cook.
Ashburton,

Sir Richard Reynell,
William Stawel.
Aylsbury,
Simon Maine,
Sir Thomas Lee.
Bambury,

Sir Robert Dashwood.
Barnstaple,

Sir George Hutchins,
Arthur Champneys.
Bath City,
Joseph Langton,
William Blaithwayt.
Beaumaris,

Thomas Bulkley.
Bedfordshire,
Hon. Edward Russel,
Thomas Brown.
Bedford Town,
Thomas Hillersden,
Thomas Christie.
Bedwin,
Sir John Raymond,

Francis Stonehouse.
Berkshire,

Sir Humphrey Forster.
Sir Henry Winchcomb,
Berwick,
Sir Francis Blake,
Samuel Ogle.
Beverly,

Sir Michael Wharton,
Ralph Wharton.
Bewdley,

Henry Herbert,
Bishops Castle, dble. ret.

Lord Herbert.

Walter Waring,
Henry Newton,
Robert More.
Thomas Howard,
Bletchingly,
Sir Robert Clayton.
Bodmin,
Nicholas Glynn,
Russel Roberts.
John Smith,
Boralston,

Sir Henry Hobart.
Boroughbridge,
Sir Henry Goodrick,
Sir Brian Stapleton.
Bossiny,
Samuel Travers,

Humphrey Nicholas.
Boston,

Hon. Peregrine Bertie,
Sir William Yorke.
Brackley,
John Blencoe,
Henry Mordaunt.
Bramber,
Nicholas Barbon,
John Ratcliffe.
Brecon County,
Sir Rowland Gwyn.
Brecon Town,
Jeffrey Jeffreys.
Bridgwater,
Sir Francis Warre,
Robert Balch.
Bridport,
John Michel,
Sir Stephen Evans.
Bristol,

Sir Richard Hart,
Sir John Knight.
Bridgenorth,

Sir Edward Acton,
Sir William Whitmore.
Bucks County,
Hon. Thomas Wharton,
Richard Hampden.

Buckingham Town,
Sir Richard Temple,
Alexander Denton.
Calne,
Henry Chivers,
William Wyndham.
Cambridgeshire,
Sir Robert Cotton,
John lord Cutts.

Cambridge Town,
Sir John Cotton,
Granado Pigot.

Cambridge University,
Edward Finch,
Henry Boyle.
Camelford,

Ambrose Manaton,
Henry Manaton.
Canterbury,

Sir William Honeywood,
Henry Lee.
Cardiff,
Thomas Mansel.
Cardigan County,
John Vaughan.
Cardigan Town,
John Lewis,
Carlisle,
Christ. Musgrave,
James Lowther.
Caermarthen County,
Sir Rice Rudd.
Caermarthen Town,
Richard Vaughan.
Caernarvon County,
Sir William Williams.
Caernarvon Town,
Sir Robert Owen.
Castle-rising,
Sir Robert Howard,
Robert Walpole.
Chester County,
Sir John Manwaring,
Sir Robert Cotton.

Chester City,

Sir Thomas Grosvenor.
Sir Richard Leving.

Chichester,
Sir Thomas Miller,
Thomas May.
Chippenham,
Alexander Popham,
Richard Long.

Chipping Wycombe,
Charles Godfrey,
Thomas Lewis.

Christ's Church,
William Etterick,
Francis Gwynn.
Cirencester,
Richard How,
John How.
Clifton,

Sir Joseph Herne,
William Hayne.
Clithero,
Roger Kenyon,
Fitton Garrard.

Cockermouth,

Sir Orlando Gee,
Sir Wilfrid Lawson.

Colchester,

Sir Isaac Rebow,
Sir Thomas Cook.
Corf-Castle,
Richard Fownes,
William Culliford.
Cornwall County,
Hon. Francis Roberts,
Hon. Hugh Boscawen.
Coventry,
Richard Hopkins,
John Stratford.

Cricklade,

Edmund Webb,
Charles Fox.

Cumberland County,
Sir George Fletcher,
Sir John Lowther.
Denbigh County,

Sir Richard Middleton.
Denbigh Town,
Edward Brereton.
Derbyshire,
Sir Gilbert Clark,
Henry Gilbert.

Derby Toran,
Anchitel Grey,
Robert Wilmot.
Devizes,
Walter Grubb,
John 'Methuen.
Devonshire,
Francis Courtney,
Samuel Rolle.
Dorsetshire,

Thomas Strangeways,
Thomas Freke.
Dorchester,
James Gould,

Thomas Trenchard.
Dover,

Thomas Papillon,
James Chadwick,
Downton,
Sir Chas. Rawley,
Maurice Buckland.

Droitwich,

Rd. earl of Bellamont,
Philip Foley.
Dunwich,

Sir Robert Rich,
John Bence.

Durham County,
Sir Robert Eden,
William Lambton.
Durham City,
William Tempest,
George Moreland.
Eastlow,
Charles Trelawney.
Henry Trelawney.
Edmunds Bury,
Sir Robert Davers,
John Harvey.
Essex,

Sir Francis Masham,
Sir Charles Barington.

Evesham,

Sir James Rushout,
Edward Rudge.
Exeter,

Sir Edward Seymour,
Christopher Bale.
Eye,
Henry Pooley,
Thomas Davenant.
Flintshire,
Sir R. Pullestone.
Flint Town,
Thomas Whitley.
Fowey,
Jonathan Rashleigh,
Shadrach Vincent.
Gatton,

Sir John Thompson,
Thomas Turgis.
Germains, (St.)
Daniel Elliot,
Henry Fleming.
Glamorgan,
Bussey Mansel.
Gloucestershire,
Sir John Guise,
Sir Ralph Dutton.
Gloucester City,
William Cook,
William Trye.
Grampound,
John Tanner,
John Buller.
Grantham,

Sir John Brownlow,
Sir William Ellis.
Grimsby,

Sir Edward Ayscough,
John Chaplin.

Grimstead,

Sir Thomas Dyke,
Lionel earl of Orrery.
Guildford,

Morgan Randell,
Foot Onslow.

Harwich,

Hastings,

Hon. John Beaumont,

Peter Gott.

Haverford West,
William Wogan.
Helston,
St. John St. Aubin,
Charles Godolphin,

Herefordshire,
Sir Herbert Crofts,
Sir Edward Harley.
Hereford City,
Paul Foley,
Henry Cornwall.
Hertfordshire,

Sir Thomas Pope Blunt,
Ralph Freeman.
Hertford Town,
Sir William Cowper,
Sir William Leman.
Heydon,
Henry Guy,
Matthew Appleyard.
Heytesbury,
William Ash,
William Trenchard.
Higham Ferrers,
Thomas Andrews.
Hindon,
Robert Hyde,
John lord Fitzharding.
Honiton,

Sir William Drake,
Sir Walter Yonge.
Horsham,
John Mitchel,
Thomas White.
Huntingdonshire,
John Dryden,
John Proby.

Huntingdon Town,
Sidney Wortley,
Richard Montagu.
Hythe,
Sir Philip Boteler,
William Brockman.
Ilchester,

Sir Edward Wyndham,
John Hunt,
Ipswich,

Sir John Barker,
Sir Charles Blois.
Ives, (St.)
James Praed,
William Harris.
Kellington,
Francis Fulford,
Jon. Prideaux.
Kent,

Sir John Knatchbull,
Sir Thomas Roberts.

Kingston upon Hull,
Charles Osborne,
John Ramsden.
Knaresborough,

T. Fawks, by one indent.
Henry Slingsby, &

Hon. Charles Viscount C. Stockdale, by another

Cheyne,

Sir Thomas Middleton.

Haslemere,
George Bridges,
Dennis Onslow,

Lancaster County,
James Stanley,
Sir Ralph Ashton.

Lancaster Town,

Roger Kirkby,

Thomas Preston.

Lanceston,
Barnard Grenville,
Henry lord Hyde.
Leicestershire,
Bennet lord Sherrard,
Sir Thomas Hasilrig.

Leicester Town,
Sir Edward Abney,
Laurence Carter.
Leominster,
Thomas Coningsby,
John Duttoncolt.
Leskard,

Sir Bouchier Wray,
Emanuel Piper.
Lestwithiel,
Sir Bevil Grenville,
Walter Kendal.
Lewes,

Thomas Pelham,
Richard Bridger.
Lincolnshire,
Hon. G. visc. Castleton,
Sir Thomas Hussey.
Lincoln City,
Sir John Bolles,
Sir Edward Hussey.
Litchfield,
Robert Burdett,
Richard Dyot.
Liverpool,
Jasper Mawdit,
Thomas Norris.
London,

Sir William Pritchard,
Sir Samuel Dashwood,
Sir Thomas Vernon,
Sir William Turner.
Ludlow,
Silas Titus,
Francis Lloyd.
Ludgershall,
Thomas Neale,
John Webb.
Lyme-Regis,
Henry Henley,
John Burridge.
Lymington,
John Burrard,
Thomas Done.
Lynn-Regis,
Sir John Turner,
Daniel Beddingfield.
Maidstone,
Sir Thomas Taylor,
Thomas Ryder.
Malden,
Charles Montagu,
Sir Eliab Harvey.
Malmsbury,
Hon. Goodwyn Wharton,
George Booth.

Malton,

Sir William Strickland,
William Palmes.
Marlborough,

Sir John Ernley,
Thomas Bennet,
Marlow, dble, ret.
James Chase,

Sir William Whitlock,

James Chase,

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »