« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »
before or after the liminal intensity is reached; or, as Luckie Elspeth puts it," before folk win the lang sleep and the sound.” Some persons claim they never dream, but we know how soon a dream remembered on awaking passes from our memory, and small faith is to be given to such testimony. Richard Baxter and Sir William Hamilton said they always awoke dreaming. Those who, like Panza, never wish for a second sleep, because the first lasts from night to morning, are not likely to remember their dreams, if they should happen.
That "cerebration" goes on in dreams we have abundant proof. Sir Thomas Browne wrote: “In one dream I can compose a whole comedy, behold the action, apprehend the jests, and laugh myself awake at the conceits thereof. memory as faithful as my reason is then fruitful, I would never study but in my dreams." Dr. Franklin assured Cabanis that the bearing of political events which puzzled him when awake was clearly unfolded to him in his dreams. Condorcet perfected in a dream the solution of a difficult problem ; Condillac, while writing his “Cours d'Études,” developed many subjects, broken off before retiring, dreaming them over. Voltaire dreamed a whole canto of the “Henriade," Maignan the truth of his the orems, and Kruger worked out complicated questions. Tartini heard in sleep the arch-fiend play his celebrated sonata, which he wrote down on awaking; Hermas said his “Pastor was dictated to him by a voice while he slept; Coleridge in sleep composed “Kubla Khan," and Robert Louis Stevenson tells us that his brownies do half his work during sleep, and that he dreamed the window scene in “Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde.” The story that Kaspar Häuser told the cobbler who discovered him, was, if not a pure invention, probably dreamed.
If the theory of sleep afore given be a true one, or even in the right direction—and it is the only one by which many of the phenomena of sleep and dreams can be explained—there is nothing strange in latent cerebration, and in the brain being always populous of images. If we suppose the cell groups variously conditioned during sleep, some empty and undergoing repair, others tenanted, but in the shadow of repose, others, again, in bright light, teeming, full of life, we can understand how ideation can go on by vicarious and alternate energy of the several clusters.
In dreaming, the swiftness of thought and the rapidity of sense-perceptions are somewhat marvelous. Processions that would occupy an hour to pass in the real world go by in a few seconds, and years are curdled into moments, as in persons in instant danger of death.
Somniloquy is, probably, always an outcome of dreaming. This term does not mean the rambling word or words that bubble out in sleep, but intelligible sentences, often telling of the rude commotion that makes the night's dismay.
“ Indicioque sui facti persaepe fuere."
“when infected minds To their deaf pillows will discharge their secrets". the unpacking in words of a guilty conscience.
Somnambulism is an acted dream, and hallucinations are dreams of waking life.
Heermann and Dr. J. Jastrow have studied the dreams of the blind, and found that such as lose their sight before five to seven years—the critical blinding age-never dream in visual terms, whilst those who become blind after this period all have dream vision. Dr. Jastrow believes, from data furnished by the examination of two hundred blind, that they dream less than the sighted, and most in terms of hearing; next, from sensations furnished by touch, their master sense; and a few in terms of taste and smell. Reading the raised type with the finger never happens in their dreams. The boys dream of playing, running, jumping, and so on; the men of broom-making (in terms of motion and feeling, and not of sight), piano-tuning, teaching, and the like; the girls and women of sewing, fancy and household work, etc.
The dreams of the deaf-mute are still a virgin field. Prof. G. Stanley Hall has studied the dream life of Laura Bridgman. He says her sleep is constant dreaming. The tactual-motor sensations, by which she receives her mind food and communicates with her fellow beings and gets her knowledge of the external world, chiefly supply her dream food. She will suddenly talk a few words with her fingers, too rapidly and too imperfectly to be understood, never making a sentence. All the people that enter into her dreams talk with their fingers. Sight and hearing terms are absent, or, strictly speaking, vague, and more likely to be akin impressions—heat and jar. In her journal, the terms of sight she uses show great limitations of her notion of this sense. She speaks of hearing with her feet : “I placed a little chair before me. I put the musical box on it, so I could feel it play with my feet.”
MORAL PRINCIPLE IN PUBLIC AFFAIRS.
In the vaults of the Treasury, idle and useless, lies a vast sum of money, the residue of excessive taxation. During the nine years since specie resumption the government has collected from its people eleven hundred millions of dollars more than its ordinary expenditures, including pensions and sinkingfund investments; about a thousand millions has been consumed in reducing the funded debt, and we have a surplus of a hundred millions left, with no prospect of its disbursement except by buying bonds at a constantly rising premium. During these nine years all the industries of the country have suffered from the cruel drain, yet Congress after Congress has been either unable or unwilling to reduce taxation. Neither of the great political parties ventured seriously to grapple with the difficulties of the situation, and so the people were left to suffer.
What is most striking in this episode, certainly the most extraordinary in history, is that while, in Congress and in the press, a great deal has been said about political economy, the claims of labor, free trade, protection, and even about points of party policy incidentally related to our system of taxation, there seems to have been a general neglect of ethical considerations. For nine years the Treasury has daily sucked in great sums of money which the government should not take, to which it has no just title, and which is really robbed from the people; but no sense of shame flushes the cheeks of any among the hundreds in Congress and the thousands outside who can arrest this drain and abolish this wrong, but who will not do so because of the restraints of party politics, or for fear that loss or injury may result to some investment or some enterprise in which they are interested.
Now and then some petty thief, tormented by remorse, is driven to divest himself of a few dollars or a few cents, and these are mingled with the millions which the law is systematically stealing from the people: the newspapers chronicle “another contribution to the conscience fund;" but the incident awakes to sympathetic movement of conscience among those who profit, politically or otherwise by the despoiling of their fellow citizens.
Perhaps if there were a law requiring all surplus revenues to be dumped into the ocean, the waste would arouse the attention of those who are unmoved by the wickedness of excessive taxation; but is there really any difference? Is it not obvious that money may be wasted without being thrown into the sea ? The entire surplus revenue is wasted, so far as the individuals are concerned to whom the money rightfully belongs and from whom it has been wrongfully taken. Regarded as their money, and not, as it is not, the money of the government, every disposition of it is wasteful except its restitution, dollar for dollar, cent for cent, to the individuals from whom it came. Whether used to buy silver at a discount or bonds at a premium, whether consumed in unnecessary expenditures or locked in the crypt of the Treasury, what each man contributes through excessive taxation to the surplus is as absolutely lost to him as if it were “in the deep bosom of the ocean buried." To speak of such expenditures as “restoring the money to the people,” is either a fraud or a fallacy, according to the lights of the speaker. He who knowingly and habitually pays for what he buys more than he needs to pay, is in peril of the lunatic asylum ; and whoever, by fraud or by force, causes another to commit such extravagance is in peril of the law; yet the citizens of the United States as taxpayers have been for years knowingly paying for their goverdment more than it actually costs, certain honored and trusted senators and representatives have employed the force of law to compel them to do so, and certain party leaders and newspapers have used false statements, fraudulent representations and suggestions, and insincere arguments to mislead voters and to maintain this extortion, while the people seem to "love to have it so." Hence it appears that, without violence to moral sensibility, we repress and punish in the individual what we exact of the citizen; we send extortioners to jail, and return to Congress those who maintain excessive taxation; we execrate the common