Before leaving this subject well to observe that it was shown that a certain amount of variation is consequent on mere act of reproduction, both by buds and sexually,—is vastly increased when parents exposed for some generations to new conditions1, and we now find that many animals when exposed for first time to very new conditions, are (as) incapable of breeding as hybrids. It [probably] bears also on supposed fact of crossed animals when not infertile, as in mongrels, tending to vary much, as likewise seems to be the case, when true hybrids possess just sufficient fertility to propagate with the parent breeds and inter se for some generations. This is Koelreuter's belief. These facts throw light on each other and support the truth of each other, we see throughout a connection between the reproductive faculties and exposure to changed conditions of life whether by crossing or exposure of the individuals2.

Difficulties on theory of selection3. It may be objected such perfect organs as eye and ear, could never be formed, in latter less difficulty as gradations more perfect; at first appears monstrous and to (the) end appears difficulty. But think of gradation, even now manifest, (Tibia and Fibula). Everyone will allow if every fossil preserved, gradation

have been intended to replace an earlier sentence. I have thought it best to give both. In the Origin, Ed. i. p. 141, vi. p. 176, the author gives his opinion that the power of resisting diverse conditions, seen in man and his domestic animals, is an example "of a very common flexibility of constitution."

1 In the Origin, Ed. i. Chs. I. and v., the author does not admit reproduction, apart from environment, as being a cause of variation. With regard to the cumulative effect of new conditions there are many passages in the Origin, Ed. i. e.g. pp. 7, 12, vi. pp. 8, 14.

As already pointed out, this is the important principle investigated in the author's Cross and Self-Fertilisation. Professor Bateson has suggested to me that the experiments should be repeated with gametically pure individuals.

In the Origin a chapter is given up to "difficulties on theory": the discussion in the present essay seems slight even when it is remembered how small a space is here available. For Tibia &c. see p. 48.

infinitely more perfect; for possibility of selection a perfect (?) gradation is required. Different groups of structure, slight gradation in each group,-every analogy renders it probable that intermediate forms have existed. Be it remembered what strange metamorphoses; part of eye, not directly connected with vision, might come to be [thus used] gradually worked in for this end,-swimming bladder by gradation of structure is admitted to belong to the ear system, -rattlesnake. [Woodpecker best adapted to climb.] In some cases gradation not possible,-as vertebræ, -actually vary in domestic animals,-less difficult if growth followed. Looking to whole animals, a bat formed not for flight1. Suppose we had flying fish2 and not one of our now called flying fish preserved, who would have guessed intermediate habits. Woodpeckers and tree-frogs both live in countries where no trees3.

The gradations by which each individual organ has arrived at its present state, and each individual animal with its aggregate of organs has arrived, probably never could be known, and all present great difficulties. I merely wish to show that the proposition is not so monstrous as it at first appears, and that if good reason can be advanced for believing the species have descended from common parents, the difficulty of imagining intermediate forms of structure not sufficient to make one at once reject the theory.

1 This may be interpreted "The general structure of a bat is the same as that of non-flying mammals."

2 That is truly winged fish.

*The terrestrial woodpecker of S. America formed the subject of a paper by Darwin, Proc. Zool. Soc., 1870. See Life and Letters, vol. iii. p. 153.

§ III. (ON VARIATION IN INSTINCTS AND OTHER MENTAL ATTRIBUTES.)

The mental powers of different animals in wild and tame state [present still greater difficulties] require a separate section. Be it remembered I have nothing to do with origin of memory, attention, and the different faculties of the mind', but merely with their differences in each of the great divisions of nature. Disposition, courage, pertinacity (?), suspicion, restlessness, ill-temper, sagacity and (the) reverse unquestionably vary in animals and are inherited. (Cuba wildness dogs, rabbits, fear against

natud particular object as man Galapagos2). Habits purely

body

corporeal, breeding season &c., time of going to rest &c., vary and are hereditary, like the analogous habits of plants which vary and are inherited. Habits of body, as manner of movement do. and do. Habits, as pointing and setting on certain occasions do. Taste for hunting certain objects and manner of doing so,-sheep-dog. These are shown clearly by crossing and their analogy with true instinct thus shown,-retriever. Do not know objects for which they do it. Lord Brougham's definition Origin partly habit, but the amount necessarily unknown, partly selection. Young pointers pointing stones and sheep-tumbling pigeons-sheep going back to place where born.

1 The same proviso occurs in the Origin, Ed. i. p. 207, vi. p. 319. The tameness of the birds in the Galapagos is described in the Journal of Researches (1860), p. 398. Dogs and rabbits are probably mentioned as cases in which the hereditary fear of man has been lost. In the 1844 Ms. the author states that the Cuban feral dog shows great natural wildness, even when caught quite young.

3 In the Origin, Ed. i. p. 207, vi. p. 319, he refuses to define instinct. For Lord Brougham's definition see his Dissertations on Subjects of Science etc., 1839, p. 27.

See James Hogg (the Ettrick Shepherd), Works, 1865, Tales and Sketches, p. 403.

Instinct aided by reason, as in the taylor-bird1. Taught by parents, cows choosing food, birds singing. Instincts vary in wild state (birds get wilder) often lost 2; more perfect,-nest without roof.

These

facts [only clear way] show how incomprehensibly brain has power of transmitting intellectual operations.

Faculties distinct from true instincts,-finding[way]. It must I think be admitted that habits whether congenital or acquired by practice [sometimes often become inherited4; instincts, influence, equally with structure, the preservation of animals; therefore selection must, with changing conditions tend to modify the inherited habits of animals. If this be admitted it will be found possible that many of the strangest instincts may be thus acquired. I may observe, without attempting definition, that an inherited habit or trick (trick because may be born) fulfils closely what we mean by instinct. A habit is often performed unconsciously, the strangest habits become associated, d°. tricks, going in certain spots &c. &c., even against will, is excited by external agencies, and looks not to the end, a person playing a pianoforte. If such a habit were transmitted it would make a marvellous instinct. Let us consider some of the most difficult cases of instincts, whether they could be possibly acquired. I do not say probably, for that belongs to our 3rd Part5, I beg this may be remembered, nor do I mean to attempt to show exact method. I want only to show that

1 This refers to the tailor-bird making use of manufactured thread supplied to it, instead of thread twisted by itself.

Often lost applies to instinct : birds get wilder is printed in a parenthesis because it was apparently added as an after-thought. Nest without roof refers to the water-ousel omitting to vault its nest when building in a protected situation.

3 In the Ms. of 1844 is an interesting discussion on faculty as distinct from instinct.

At this date and for long afterwards the inheritance of acquired characters was assumed to occur.

Part II. is here intended: see the Introduction.

whole theory ought not at once to be rejected on this

score.

Every instinct must, by my theory, have been acquired gradually by slight changes (illegible) of former instinct, each change being useful to its then species. Shamming death struck me at first as remarkable objection. I found none really sham death1, and that there is gradation; now no one doubts that those insects which do it either more or less, do it for some good, if then any species was led to do it more, and then (?) escaped &c. &c.

Take migratory instincts, faculty distinct from instinct, animals have notion of time,-like savages. Ordinary finding way by memory, but how does savage find way across country,-as incomprehensible to us, as animal to them,-geological changes,-fishes in river,-case of sheep in Spain2. Architectural instincts,-a manufacturer's employee in making single articles extraordinary skill,-often said seem to make it almost (illegible), child born with such a notion of playing-we can fancy tailoring acquired in same perfection,-mixture of reason,-water-ouzel, taylor-bird,-gradation of simple nest to most complicated.

Bees again, distinction of faculty,-how they make a hexagon,-Waterhouse's theory,-the impulse to use whatever faculty they possess,-the taylor-bird has the faculty of sewing with beak, instinct impels him to do it.

Last case of parent feeding young with different food (take case of Galapagos birds, gradation from

1 The meaning is that the attitude assumed in shamming is not acqurately like that of death.

This refers to the transandantes sheep mentioned in the Ms. of 1844, as having acquired a migratory instinct.

3 In the Origin, Ed. i. p. 209, vi. p. 321, Mozart's pseudo-instinctive skill in piano-playing is mentioned. See Phil. Trans., 1770, p. 54.

In the discussion on bees' cells, Origin, Ed. i. p. 225, vi. p. 343, the author acknowledges that his theory originated in Waterhouse's observations.