who enjoy a "lion gathering" or a menagerie of foreign celebrities of the genus homo, as heartily as the Castilian enjoys his cock-fight. (To be continued in our next.) ODE FOR THE FOURTH OF JULY. BY COLONEL EIDOLON. AGAIN has come the glorious day- Tells of the carnage and the rout, The slain, where hosts had striven; That wiled the tedious time along; The soldier friend, the true, the brave, But now no more the trumpet horn Lay stretched upon the bloody heath: Long since the waving grass has grown, And flowers have wreathed each bleaching bone. Hark to the rolling drum, and see, Borne lightly on the air, The banner of the proud and free, The banner bright and fair! And loud huzzas around arise, And many a tribute now is paid To those whose heads are lowly laid; And many a gallant deed is sung. Yes! 'tis the great, the glorious Fourth! Let East and West, and South and North Raise a triumphant voice. T'was on this day our Fathers broke A little band of Patriots rise A nation's pride and sacrifice. How proud each freeman treads the sod, How fires his flashing eye! And muttered praises to his God, In patriot cheering die! He thinks but on the gallant band He can enjoy without regret, Spoils that the gallant dead have won: De Kalb, Pulaski, Lafayette, Led by the godlike Washington. Spread out beneath a smiling sky, Millions on millions acres lie, Won by the high-souled men who bore The hardships of the fight of yore; Whose names we celebrate to-day, Whose deeds shall last till suns decay, While by their mother earth caressed, On well-fought fields their ashes rest. From the far snow-capped hills of Maine, We're brothers for all time; Let freedom's blessings spread abroad STATE SOVEREIGNTY AND FEDERAL USURPATIONS. "WE, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, and insure domestic tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."—Preamble of the Constitution of the United States. CONSTITUTIONAL history teaches us that governments have usually been divided into consolidated and confederated. A consolidated government presumes that the interests of its people are so analogous as to warrant the depository of all power in one legislature, to be exercised for the benefit of the people as a unity. It is in a government of this nature that the legislative maxim of ubi major pars est, ibi est totum, is alone applicable; such communities having usually been of such limited territorial extent as to render the interests of its constituents so similar, that the adoption of this maxim would not materially endanger the political rights of the minority. The consolidated form of government has not usually been the result of voluntary association on the part of its constituents, but has more frequently grown out of adventitious circumstances, wholly beyond the control of the individuals composing it. A prolific source of this form of government is to be sought for in the ambition of some powerful individual urging a victorious career into neighboring communities, subjugating and finally consolidating them into one grand political body as a means of gratifying his peculiar views of personal aggrandizement. The principal European governments are illustrative of the consolidated form, both in their origin and operationbased as they are upon the Feudal System, which history teaches to have originated as above specified. In contradistinction to the above, the confederate or federal form of government is a voluntary association of sovereign and independent political bodies of such dissimilitude of interests as to render the consolidated form, by virtue of the above-quoted maxim, highly objectionable; such an amalgamation as the consolidated form calls for necessarily proving subversive of the rights of the minority of said political bodies. Examples of this 47 form of government are to be sought for in the ancient republics of Greece, in the Achæan, the Lycian, and Amphyclonic council; in the Germanic, the Helvetic, and Hanseatic Republics of modern times; these being an association of sovereign and independent political bodies, of dissimilar local interests, but all having a common interest in certain objects of a general import. Having defined the two governments now existing in the world, namely, the consolidated and the confederated-the momentous question, which now divides the public opinion of the people of the States, arises, Is the government of the United States a consolidated or a confederate or federal government? This question can only be determined by an appeal to the impartial page of history, the only arbiter between the highly-respectable parties which now divide the government of these States. To this source of light and truth we now turn in order to establish the confederate in opposition to the consolidated character of our government. The history of the infant colonies teaches us that the country comprised within the limits of the now United States of America was originally patented in the reign of James I., of England, into two portions: that in less than eighty years from that period, the same was again divided into twelve distinct provinces; a thirteenth being after added in the creation of the State of Georgia. Thus far, then, it is evident, that in a territorial point of view, the now United States never formed one government; being in the first instance divided into two portions, then into twelve distinct provinces and subsequently into thirteen-by the addition of the State of Georgia. That they never formed one political body shall also be proved; their early constitutional history most indubitably proving the same. By a reference to constitutional history we learn that the earliest forms of the colonial governments were four in number. The first was the charter government, by which the power of legislating was vested in a Governor, Council, and Assembly. Of this kind were the governments of Connecticut and Rhode-Island, as also that of Plymouth Colony, and originally that of Massachusetts. The second form of government was that of the proprietary, in which the proprietor of the Province was Governor, the Assembly being chosen by the people of the Province. Of this kind were the governments of Pennsylvania and Maryland; and originally those of New-Jersey and the Carolinas. The third form of government was the royal, in which the Governor and Council were appointed by the Crown, the Assembly being elected by the people. Such were the governments of New-Hampshire, New-York, Virginia, and Georgia, and New-Jersey after 1702, as also the Carolinas after 1728. The fourth was a mixed form of government, in which the Governor alone was appointed by the King; both the Assembly and the Council |