Изображения страниц
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][graphic][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors]

OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE

7 PATERNOSTER ROW

BURKE

SELECT WORKS

EDITED

WITH INTRODUCTION AND NOTES

BY

E. J. PAYNE, M.A.

OF LINCOLN'S INN, BARRISTER-AT-LAW,
AND FELLOW OF UNIVERITY COLLEGE, OXFORD

VOL. II

REFLECTIONS ON THE REVOLUTION IN FRANCE

Oxford

AT THE CLARENDON PRESS

MDCCCLXXXI

[All rights reserved]

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

own.

The famous letter or pamphlet contained in this volume represents the workings of an extraordinary mind at an extraordinary crisis: and can therefore be compared with few things that have ever been spoken or written. Composed in a literary age, it scarcely belongs to literature; yet it is one of the greatest of literary masterpieces. It embodies nothing of history save fragments which have mostly lost their interest, yet no book in the world has more historical significance. It scorns and defies philosophy, but it discloses a compact and unique system of its

It tramples on logic, yet carries home to the most logical
reader a conviction that its ill-reasoning is substantially correct.
No one would think of agreeing with it in the mass, yet there
are parts to which every candid mind will assent. Its many true
and wise sayings are mixed up with extravagant and barefaced
sophistry: its argument, with every semblance of legal exact-
ness, is disturbed by hasty gusts of anger, and broken by chasins
which yawn in the face of the least observant reader. It is
an intellectual puzzle, not too abstruse for solution: and hence
few books are better adapted to stimulate the attention and
judgment, and to generate the invaluable habit of mental vigilance.

T discover its defects is easy enough. No book in the world
yields itself an easier prey to hostile criticism: there are thousands
of school-boys, 'with liberal notions under their caps,' to whom
the greatest intellect of our nation since Milton!, represented by
the best known parts of the present work, might well seem little
better than a fool. After a time, this impression disappears;
eloquence and deep conviction have done their work, and the
wisdom of a few pages, mostly dealing in generalities, is con-
structively extended to the whole. But the reader now vacillates
again: and this perpetual alternation of judgment on the part of
a reader not thoroughly in earnest constitutes a main part of that
fascination which Burke universally exercises. It is like the

* So Macaulay has styled Burke.

fascination of jugglery: now you believe your eyes, now you distrust them: the brilliancy of the spectacle first dazzles, and then satisfies: and you care little for what lies behind. This is what the author intended: the critical faculty is disarmed, the imagination is enthralled.

What did Burke propose to himself when he sat down to write this book ? The letter to Dupont is obviously a mere peg upon which to hang his argument: the ook written for the British public. He believed himself to foresee whither the revolutionary movement in France was tending : he saw one party in England regarding it with favour, the other with indifference: he saw clear revolutionary tendencies on all sides among the people: and not a single arm was as yet raised to avert the impending catastrophe. Burke aimed at recalling the English nation to its ancient principles, and at showing the folly and imprudence of the French political movement. Burke's independence led him even to the extent of revolting from his own party. The great historical Whig party, the party of Somers, of Walpole, and of Chatham, was slowly passing through a painful transformation, which many observers mistook for dissolution. Burke found himself constrained to desert it, and that upon an occasion which afforded an opportunity of rendering it material support. From that time forward he became a marked man. Even for Burke the act of thinking for himself was stigmatised as a crime. While the events of the French Revolution commended themselves to the leaders of his party, he ought not to have allowed it to be seen that they aroused in him nothing but anger and scorn; nor ought he to have appealed to the nation at large to support him in his opposition. Such an appeal to the general public was characteristic of definite change of allegiance. Hence the obloquy which overwhelmed the last years of his life, raised by those who had been his associates during a career of a quarter of a century. Hence his counter-denunciation of them as' New Whigs,' as renegades from the principles of the English Revolution, by virtue of the countenance they gave to the political changes which were taking place in France.

Are Burke's opinions in the present work consistent with those contained in the first volume ? Notwithstanding that fundamental unity which may be justly claimed for Burke's opinions,

« ПредыдущаяПродолжить »