with the highest care. Ile seems to have exulted in sallying forth to single combat against the boasted and formidable hero, who bade defiance to "principalities and powers, and the rulers of this world.”

This pamphlet, it is observable, was softened in one particular, after the first edition ; for the conclusion of Mr. George Grenville's character stood thus : " Let him not, however, be depreciated in his grave. He had powers not universally possessed : could he have enforced payment of the Manilla ransom, he could have counted it.” Which, instead of retaining its sly sharp point, was reduced to a mere flat unmeaning expression, or, if I may use the word,—truism : “He had powers not universally possessed : and if he sometimes erred, he was likewise sometimes right.

"TO BENNET LANGTON, ESQ. “ DEAR SIR,

March 20, 1771. “After much lingering of my own, and much of the ministry, I have at length got out my paper. But delay is not yet at an end: not many had been dispersed before Lord North ordered the sale to stop. His reasons I do not distinctly know. You may try to find them in the perusal.2 Before his order, a sufficient number were dispersed to do all the mischief, though, perhaps, not to make all the sport that might be expected from it.

“Soon after your departure, I had the pleasure of finding all the danger past with which your navigation was threatened. I hope nothing happens at home to abate your satisfaction ; but that Lady Rothes and Mrs. Langton, and the young ladies, are all well.

“I was last night at THE CLUB. Dr. Percy has written a long b:allad in many fits; it is pretty enough. He has printed, and will soon publish it. Goldsmith is at Bath with Lord Clare. At Mr. Thrale's, where I am now writing, all are well. I am, dear Sir, your most humble servant,

“SAM. JOHNSON." Mr. Strahan, the printer, who had been long in intimacy with Johnson, in the course of his literary labours, who was at once his friendly agent in receiving his pension for him, and his banker in supplying him with money when he wanted it; who was himself now a member of Parliament, and who loved much to be employed in political negociation; thought he should do eminent service, both to government and Johnson, if he could be the means of his getting a seat in the House of Commons. With this view, he wrote a letter to one of the Secretaries of the Treasury, of which he gave me a copy in his own handwriting, which is as follows:

1 “ Thoughts on the late Transactions respecting Falkland's Islands."

2 By comparing the first with the subsequent editions, this curious circumstance of ministerial authorship may be discovered.

It can only be discovered (as Mr. Bindley observes to me) by him who possesses a copy of the first edition issued out before the sale was stopped.-MALONE.

“SIR,

New-street, March 30, 1771. “You will easily recollect, when I had the honour of waiting upon you some time ago, I took the liberty to observe to you, that Dr. Johnson would make an excellent figure in the House of Commons, and heartily wished he had a seat there.. My reasons are briefly these :

“I know his perfect good affection to his Majesty and his government, which I am certain he wishes to support by every means in his power.

“ He possesses a great share of manly, nervous, and ready eloqnence ; is quick in discerning the strength and weakness of an argument; can express himself with clearness and precision, and fears the face of no man alive.

“ His known character, as a man of extraordinary sense and unimpeached virtue, would secure him the attention of the House, and could not fail to give him a proper weight there.

“He is capable of the greatest application, and can undergo any degree of labour, where he sees it necessary, and where his heart and aff-ctions are strongly engaged. His Majesty's ministers might therefore securely depend on his doing, upon every proper occasion, the utmost that could be expected from him. They would find him ready to vindicate such measures as tended to promote the stability of government, and resolute and steady in carrying them into execution. Nor is anything to be apprehended from the supposed impetuosity of his temper. To the friends of the king you will find him a lamb, to his enemies a lion.

“For these reasons, I humbly apprehend that he would be a very able and useful member. And I will venture to say, the employment would not be disagreeable to him; and knowiny, as I do, his strony affection to the king, his ability to serve him in that capacity, and the extreme ardour with which I am convinced he would engage in that service, I must repeat that I wish most heartily to see him in the House.

“If you think this worthy of attention, you will be pleased to take a convenient opportunity of mentioning it to Lord North. If his lordship should happily approve of it, I shall have the satisfaction of having been, in some degree, the humble instrument of doing my country, in my opinion, a very essential service. I know your good nature, and your zeal tor the public welfare, will plead my excuse for giving you this trouble. I am, with the greatest respect, Sir, “Your most obedient and humble servant,

“WILLIAM STRAHAN." This recommendation, we know, was not effectual; but how, or for what reason, can only be conjectured. It is not to be believed that Mr. Strahan would have applied, unless Johnson had approved of it. I never heard him mention the subject; but at a later period of his life, when Sir Joshua Reynolds told him that Mr. Edmund Burke had said, that if he had come early into Parliament, he certainly would have been the greatest speaker that ever was there, Johnson exclaimed, " I should like to try my hand now.”

It has been much agitated among his friends and others, whether he would have been a powerful speaker in Parliament, had he been brought

"1

get on.

in when advanced in life. I am inclined to think, that his extensive knowledge, his quickness and force of mind, his vivacity and richness of expression, his wit and humour, and above all, his poignancy of sarcasm, would have had great effect in a popular assembly; and that the magnitude of his figure, and striking peculiarity of his manner, would have aided the effect. But I remember it was observed by Mr. Flood, that Johnson, having been long used to sententious brevity and the short flights of conversation, might have failed in that continued and expanded kind of argument, which is requisite in stating complicated matters in public speaking; and, as a proof of this, he mentioned the supposed speeches in Parliament written by him for the magazine, none of which, in his opinion, were at all like real debates. The opinion of one who was himself so eminent an orator, must be allowed to have great weight. It was confirmed by Sir William Scott, who mentioned, that Johnson had told him, that he had several times tried to speak in the Society of Arts and Manufactures, but “had found he could not

From Mr. William Gerard Hamilton I have heard, that Johnson, when observing to him that it was prudent for a man who had not been accustomed to speak in public, to begin his speech in as simple a manner as possible, acknowledged that he rose in that society to deliver a speech which he had prepared ; “ but,” said he, “all my flowers of oratory forsook me.” I, however, cannot help wishing, that he had “ tried his hand in Parliament; and I wonder that ministry did not make the experiment.”

I at length renewed a correspondence which had been too long discontinued :

“ TO DR. JOHNSON. “MY DEAR SIR,

Edinburgh, April 18, 1771. “I can now fully understand those intervals of silence in your correspondence with me, which have often given me anxiety and uneasiness ; for although I am conscious that my veneration and love for Mr. Johnson have never in the least abated, yet I have deferred for almost a year and a half to write to him.”

In the subsequent part of this letter, I gave him an account of my comfortable life as a married man, and a lawyer in practice at the Scotch bar; invited him to Scotland, and promised to attend him to the Highlands and Hebrides.

"TO JAMES BOSWELL, ESQ. “ DEAR SIR,

London, June 20, 1771. “ If you are now able to comprehend that I might neglect to write without diminution of affection, you have taught me, likewise, how that neglect may be

6

uneasily felt without resentment. I wished for your letter a long time, and when it came, it amply recompensed the delay. I never was so much pleased as now with your account of yourself; and sincerely hope, that between public business, improving studies, and domestic pleasures, neither melancholy nor caprice will find any place for entrance. Whatever philosophy may determine of material nature, it is certainly true of intellectual nature, that it abhors a vacuum : our minds cannot be empty; and evil will break in upon them, if they are not pre-occupied by good. My dear Sir, mind your studies, mind your business, make your lady happy, and be a good Christian. After this,

tristitiam et metus Trades protervis in mare Creticum

Portare ventis.' “If we perform our duty, we shall be safe and steady, ‘Sive per,' &c., whether we climb the Highlands, or are tossed among the Hebrides ; and I hope the time will come when we may try our powers both with cliffs and water. I see but little of Lord Elibank, I know not why ; perhaps by my own fault. I am this day going into Staffordshire and Derbyshire for six weeks.

“I am, dear Sir,
“Your most affectionate and most humble servant,

“Sam. JOHNSON."

TO SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS, IN LEICESTER FIELDS. “DEAR SIR,

Ashbourne, in Derbyshire, July 17, 1771. “When I came to Lichfield, I found that my portrait 1 had been much visited, and much admired. Every man has a lurking wish to appear considerable in his native place; and I was pleased with the dignity conferred by such a testimony of your regard. “Be pleased, therefore, to accept the thanks of, Sir, “Your most obliged and most humble servant,

“SAM. JOHNSON.” “Compliments to Miss Reynolds."

TO DR. JOHNSON

“MY DEAR SIR,

Edinburgh, July 27, 1771. “The bearer of this, Mr. Beattie, professor of moral philosophy at Aberdeen, is desirous of being introduced to your acquaintance. llis genius and learning, and labours in the service of virtue and religion, render him very worthy of it: and as he has a high esteem of your character, I hope you will give him a favourable reception.

I ever am, &c., JAMES BOSWELL.” “TO BENNET LANGTON, ESQ., AT LANGTON, NEAR SPILSBY, LINCOLNSHIRE “DEAR SIR,

August 29, 1771. “I am lately returned from Staffordshire and Derbyshire. The last letter mentions two others which you have written to me since you received my

pamphlet. Of these two I never had but one, in which you mentioned a design of visiting Scotland, and, by consequence, put my journey to Langton out of my

your uneasiness.

thoughts. My summ

omer wanderings are now over, and I am engaging in a very great work, the revision of my Dictionary ; from which I know not, at present, how to get loose.

" If you have observed, or been told, any errors or omissions, you will do me a great favour by letting me know them.

• Lady Rothes, I find, has disappointed you and herself. Ladies will have these tricks. The Queen and Mrs. Thrale, both ladies of experience, yet both missed their reckoning this suinmer. I hope a few months will recompense

“Plea-e to tell Lady Rothes how highly I value the honour of her invitation, which it is my purpose to obey as soon as I have disengaged myself. In the meantime I sh: hope hear often of ladyship, and every day better news and better, till I hear that you have both the happiness, which to both is very sincerely wished, by, Sir, “Your most affectionate and most humble servant,

SAM. JOHNSON." In October I again wrote to him, thanking him for his last letter, and his obliging reception of Mr. Beattie ; informing him that I had been at Alnwick lately, and had good accounts of him from Dr. Percy.