Faith, Humor, and Paradox
On the other side, Götz shows what happens when faith and humor depart from paradox: faith becomes dogmatic and fanatical, and humor becomes superficial and banal. Fanatical faith latches onto beliefs and dogmas rather than to the openness of paradox, and so it leads to terrorism against those who hold onto different beliefs. Götz also warns against an easy embrace of tolerance as the only alternative to fanaticism, because tolerance itself is imperfect and is often forced to accept evil. It should not, Götz argues, be the sole solution inculcated in our schools. This is a thoughtful and provocative analysis that will be of interest to the general reader as well as scholars and students interested in the place of religion in contemporary society. |
Результаты поиска по книге
Результаты 6 – 10 из 40
In fact some scholars maintain he did not exist , but that his " paradox " was invented by a certain Eubulides of Megara , the successor of Euclid . At any rate , the statement is quoted by St. Paul in his letter to Titus ( 1:12 ) .
30 Yet this solution seems inadequate since it is not verifiable in fact . PARMENIDES AND ZEN Other examples of ancient paradoxes can be stated briefly . Nagarjuna ( ca. 200 C.E. ) was one of the main intellectual exponent of Mahayana ...
Извините, доступ к содержанию этой страницы ограничен..
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Вы достигли ограничения на просмотр для этой книги.
Отзывы - Написать отзыв
Содержание
11 | |
Faith and Paradox | 23 |
Faith and Paradox Cases | 33 |
Faith Hope and Unbelief | 49 |
Faith Dogma and Fanaticism | 61 |
The Structure of Humor | 81 |
On Frivolity | 93 |
Humor and Faith | 103 |
Conclusion | 115 |
Bibliography | 123 |
Index | 133 |